On Thu, Sep 22, 2016, at 11:40, HOSTLINE wrote:
Old LIR's and/or those with legacy IPv4 blocks paying the same amount of money as new LIR's - the current billing scheme, * but if* RIPE NCC recover some IPv4 pools or gets recovered from IANA, they can allocate for LIR's that have only /22 new /22, or /23 (depending on resources avail).
Using FIFO model, oldest LIR's with only 1 /22 will get second allocation. Rules could be also that for example, you can't get second assignment in first 2 years when you get first one.
If LIR's who has only /22 and never used transfer services, i.e. they have only this allocation of IPv4 they are eligible for second /22 or /23, maybe even /24. If LIR who has /22 and bought/transferred IPv4 - are not eligible.
Don't remember having your name on the list of supporters of 2015-05 (which was supposed to do something very similar). :)
Because now a lot of people registering (2nd, 3rd, etc) LIR's for only one goal - after two years to make a transfer to parent LIR. In such a case - if you know, that even *maybe* you have a chance to get IPv4 allocation after 2 years - it may worth waiting and not spending money, abusing RIPE NCC with paper work on LIR's registration, etc.
Please have a look at the thread concerning 2015-05 on Address Policy Working Group. You can get an insight on how things work (or not). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN (co-proposer of 2015-05)