On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
Don't try to speak for "most here". I, for one, have met Lu Heng in person, have seen him actively take part in the address policy discussions, and do trust the RIPE NCC to very closely check whether such a big allocation can be backed by numbers and documentation. So I most certainly do not see "CLEARLY" that there would be a violation of RIPE policies - and even if it's currently announced from elsewhere, that doesn't mean it's not actually *used* in the RIPE service region (think "VPN services"), which is the key issue - address space being *used*, and not siphoned off elsewhere. Even though the latter point is a bit moot nowadays.
Agreed. However: nmap -n -sn -PE -T4 37.222.0.0/15 Nmap done: 131072 IP addresses (406 hosts up) scanned in 210.43 seconds --Dave