I dont think so. Members want members to pay proportional as their resources. The increase of the costs is a result of the solution proposals, because actually for example one member with about %0,5 of the general resources pays the same as a member with about %0,005 or may be %0,0005 only.

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards

Murat TERZIOGLU
PREBITS

Bochumer Str. 20

44866 Bochum

Deutschland

Telefon: 0234/58825994

Telefax: 0234/58825995

www.prebits.de

info@prebits.de

USt-ID: DE315418902

Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. April 2024 11:50
An: Kurtis Lindqvist <kurtis@linx.net>
Cc: Kurt Jaeger <members-discuss@nepustil.net>; members-discuss@ripe.net
Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

Confidential/Конфіденційно

Hello Kurtis!

I think there is one more circle. Some members simply want to increase the cost of ownership IPv4 address space.

Perhaps, from their point of view, this will result in some IPv4 addresses being transferred back to RIPE.

P.S. I believe it is not, a lot of reasons why.

From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of Kurtis Lindqvist
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 11:56 AM
To: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net>; Kurt Jaeger <members-discuss@nepustil.net>
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

You don't often get email from kurtis@linx.net. Learn why this is important

Hi Kaj!

Isn’t this really at the heart of the problem. In a Venn diagram there are (at least) three circles here, the members with an opinion the mailinglist who want to crystalise the core services and keep RIPE NCC costs lower and see greater efficiency gains, there is the circle of members who respond to the membership survey and are happy and want to keep all services as they are and then there is a circle of the members who actually vote (and possibly manage the payments). I am not convinced there is a great overlap of these circles and so we end up in a situation with very little guidance.

Best Regards,

- kurtis -

--

Kurt Erik Lindqvist, CEO

T: +44 (0) 20 7645 3528 | www.linx.net

London Internet Exchange Ltd (LINX)
C/O WeWork, 2 Minister Court, London, EC3R 7BB, United Kingdom
Registered in England number 3137929

From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net>
Date: Tuesday, 16 April 2024 at 19:49
To: Kurt Jaeger <members-discuss@nepustil.net>
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

Hi,

Good points.

On the topic of AFRINIC, I would slightly disagree. Membership numbers have been increasing from about 1200 in 2018-ish, when they restated revenue, at around 5.3M USD to the 6M-ish USD I mentioned in my previous email. I haven't actively been following the story there but assumed the legal troubles started FY2021-ish.. since revenue was restated, there was probably something else going on earlier. They spent about 140k on legal in 2022 although only non-audited numbers exist. I'm reading it as if the legal issues themselves did not affect revenue one way or another.

As for RIPE, well, I'm advocating on spending less and crystallizing the value prop because right now it's all over the place.

1. LIRs [must] pay because they need the registry services
2. In exchange they get a ton of services that many do not use at all
3. All services and functions are necessary because [list with many reasons]
4. "We need to increase the fees because of 2 and 3"
5. Goto 1

That being said, the gym analogy someone replied with a few days ago is quite apt. Most people there, too, pay but do not use.

Kaj

Sent from my iPad

---

From: Kurt Jaeger <members-discuss@nepustil.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2024 8:06 PM
To: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net>
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

[You don't often get email from members-discuss@nepustil.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

Hi!

Thanks for writing up those stats.

> Let's do some napkin math and comps with the other RIRs. [...]
>
> RIPE, revenue 38M EUR (40M USD), members 20k = 2 k/member
> ARIN, revenue 25M USD, members 25k = 1 k/member
> APNIC, revenue 33M AUD (21M USD), members 10k = 2 k/member
> LACNIC, revenue 10M USD, members 12k = 0.8 k/member
> AFRINIC, revenue 6M USD, members 2k = 3 k/member
[...]

> Now, in my opinion, there are a few surprises.
> ARIN, located in a very expensive country, is quite efficient per member.

I think one has to analyse if ARIN and RIPE do the same
when it comes to reach-out, research etc. I'm not sure
that ARIN is as active as RIPE is. Also: The language barrier
in the service area is much more difficult to traverse
than in the ARIN service area. And the RIPE has to cope with a
very difficult legal and political landscape compared to ARIN.

> On the other hand, AFRINIC seems to be rather inefficient.

I would not hold that against AFRINIC, given their legal and political
landscape.

--
MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger                                Now what ?
Dr.-Ing. Nepustil & Co. GmbH  fon +49 7123 93006-0  pi@nepustil.net
Rathausstr. 3                 mob +49 171 3101372
72658 Bempflingen