You are correct, my apologies, I've found a better list since
they stopped counting your votes on the main page I linked after
you were excluded from each seat.
https://www.bigpulse.com/disclosevotes?code=1589526324cr4MYdWrZtsXE2HZhqPu
So looking at this list here are the unique votes you received:
First Choice: 200 Votes
Second Choice: 42 Votes
Third Choice: 29 Votes
Fourth Choice: 26 Votes
Fifth Choice: 10 Votes
Sixth Choice: 5 Votes
Seventh Choice: 18 Votes
Eighth Choice: 152 Votes
So let us consider the fact that only three seats were up for
election.
You had a total of 271 Votes that ranked you third or higher -
you then received another 59 Votes that places you as peoples
fourth - seventh choice. You had an astonishing 152 people list
you as their very last choice.
So yes, you are correct that 482 people actually did select your name, but 152 of those put you dead last. This was a choice based vote, where you ordered your pick based on the candidates you wanted to succeed. So in reality only 1.07% of the total LIR's gave you any confidence in the position of 1,2 or 3 , even if we total up every vote, including those who placed you dead last which statistically "don't matter" since it's a contest of 3 positions you only received 1.9% of the total LIR membership.
You sir, are statistically insignificant and received almost
as many last place votes as you did first place.
Daniel,
You are the one spreading lies, I received more than 300 votes from approximately 2800 total voters, not all the RIPE community voted.
Kind Regards,Elad
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 2:55 PM
To: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderationElad,
You really need help in a lot of areas, math is one of them.
You received a total of 305 votes based on the election rounds, so you got approx 1.205% of the members to support you based on the current total number of LIRs of 25,302 https://labs.ripe.net/statistics/number-of-lirs
Please, stop lying and spreading mis-information about yourself, and libel of others.
If I were the RIPE NCC I would be very concerned about your actions and them continuing to provide you a platform to disparage the individual members here with no proof and wild accusations. You've well crossed over into libelous territory more than a few times here in this list and it would be a shame if your nonsense actually caused financial harm to the individuals you target.
Daniel~
On 7/21/20 5:54 AM, Elad Cohen wrote:
Andrei, I received 15% of the total votes, which are reflecting 15% of the total members in the RIPE community, approximately 4000 members. The total number of my initial votes was more than the total number of votes of the elected #3 which was elected only because he received the support of the elected #1 in the way that the current voting system works.
You are trying to censor, you are using very nice words but at the end you are only trying to censor and to force your opinions on 4000 members of the RIPE community and not to have diversity of other views in the RIPE Executive Board.
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Andrei Banu <andrei.banu@redhost.ro>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 1:45 PM
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>; exec-board@ripe.net <exec-board@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Request to put Members-discuss in moderationIndeed the list moderation is by far NOT the correct solution and it is indeed a capitulation in front of a single source of useless noise! But the useless noise brought to the list by only one culprit is not the only problem here and it's the smallest problem.
The bigger problem is that the culprit was admitted into the Election Task Force, a Task Force created specifically because of the unfit (put very nicely and extremely mildly) candidacy of the same culprit during the latest elections. I am still baffled since yesterday and I can't fathom what process allowed the culprit to be admitted into a Task Force designed specifically to avoid the very same type of behavior exhibited by the culprit numerous times. This is truly ironic and I fear that it might compromise all the efforts of the rest of the Task Force (or possibly, it's credibility). And this bigger problem will NOT get solved by ignoring the troll on the list (which most of us are obviously already doing).
On 21.07.2020 12:54, Misak Khachatryan wrote:
-1
Why you just not ignore him? Why you all feeding the troll? He just replies to any email, just don't reply. Moderation is just a capitulation and sign of community weakness.
Best regards,
Misak Khachatryan,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 1:48 PM Hamed Shafaghi <hamed@mihantelecom.com> wrote:
+1
| Hamed Shafaghi |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 12:22 PM Erik Bais <ebais@a2b-internet.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________Dear Executive Board of the RIPE NCC,
Please put the members-discuss@ ML onto moderation.
This madness has gone long enough.
Regards,
Erik Bais
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/hamed%40mihantelecom.com
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/andrei.banu%40redhost.ro