Check this out from APNIC, they are long time ago to base on the
ip resources for membership fee calculation, for your reference.
http://submit.apnic.net/cgi-bin/feecalc.pl
APNIC
Annual Membership Fees Calculator
Use
this tool as a guide to estimate APNIC fees based on a particular resource
holding.
Enter
the amount of IPv4 and IPv6 resources in the relevant fields using 'slash
notation'.
|
IPv4 |
eg.
/23 + /24 |
|
IPv6 |
eg.
/30 + /34 (maximum /56). |
|
|
IPv4
and IPv6 calculations are done separately. The fee charged is the greater of
the two results.
Your
membership renewal invoices will be calculated based on your resource holdings
assessed as at the date of your membership anniversary.
·
Applies to members only
·
Estimated fees are based on
the higher of IPv4 or IPv6 fees
·
Address holdings include
current and historical resources
·
Australian organizations are
required to pay GST (Goods and Services Tax) on all APNIC fees
Best regards,
Terry Choy
Planning & Development | Internet
& Private Networks | Telstra International Group
Direct: +852 2983 3025
Email: terry.choy@team.telstra.com
From:
members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net] On
Behalf Of Cenk Keylan
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 5:57 PM
To: Ulf Kieber; members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
Hi Ulf,
As IP4 is limited resource sure it must have a fee, else how
will the new commers can access to the IP4 while the large ISP’s have
millions of unused IP addresses which they have got from Ripe years ago. As a
simple argument, we have an ISP in Turkey which even their license is taken
back and they have 100K times more IP addresses then we have and nobody is
asking tem to give the IP addresses back and they are keeping the IP4 block as
the fee they pay for membership is not important then the IP4 block they
are keeping in hand.
Have a nice day,
Cenk Keylan
|
From:
members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net] On
Behalf Of Ulf Kieber
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 11:47 AM
To: members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
Have a look at http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/faq/faq-general-resources
“IP addresses are a shared public resource and are
not for sale.”
The fee you pay is not a fee for IP addresses, but a fee for
supplied registration services by the RIPE NCC.
Please also remember that by making an IP address an accountable
ressources and sticking a price tag onto it, taxability in the Netherlands will
change, yielding an approx. 25% increase in taxes (and fees).
Since I’m a little bit fed up with this discussion now I
hereby request to make the fee a real membership fee for the RIPE association;
one member, one fee; budget divided by the number of members.
Best regards,
Ulf Kieber
Head of NOC
green.ch AG
From: members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net
[mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net]
On Behalf Of KOSMOZZ - Info
Sent: Montag, 13. Februar 2012 19:26
To: Lu Heng; members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
Hi Lu,
I was thinking the same. Why shouldn’t we all be
billed for the amount we are using and may’be pay a fee for the amount
that has been reserved and not used?
I’ll take this with me to the Taskforce currently
brainstorming on Billing matters.
Kind regards,
Filip Herman
KOSMOZZ -- http://www.kosmozz.be
| Member of Internet Service Providers Belgium (http://www.ispa.be)
Van: members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net
[mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net]
Namens Lu Heng
Verzonden: maandag 13 februari 2012 18:44
Aan: members-discuss@ripe.net
Onderwerp: [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
Hi Colleagues:
Just had a whim about next year's
membership fees, since Ripe will almost certain running out this year, why
shouldn't we divided the membership fees as the percentage of the
total recourse we have?(mostly IPv4)
The total amount of Ripe's IPv4 is known,
and by end of this year, the total amount of each LIR's IPv4 is known as well.
So why should we just simpy do a math as
LIR total amount address(L)/Ripe's total amount of address(R)*100%*Ripe's total
need(TN)=Lir's yearly contribution(C)
So make the format simple:
C=(L/R*100%)*TN
Then I think it is "real fair".
And as calculate the member fee based on the share of member in the
organization's recourse's, it doesn't imply as "selling IP" rumor
which has been the main reason we have categories rather than real fair
solutions.
How you think, my colleagues, and this is
just my 2 cents thought.
--
--
Kind regards.
Lu
This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and
e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
message and including the text of the transmission received.