Rob, believe me, those who burnet IPv4 space like Gert will never transition to IPv6, we have an example Gert for that in which he has for 25 years alerting members to implement IPv6 but he/his company has for 25 years implemented 1.6% of IPv6! Btw my new moto is from now on: -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? Because i will never do, but you should do it :) On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:54 PM Rob Evans <rhe@nosc.ja.net> wrote:
Just to reiterate this:
They did, actually. All the old LIRs created policies to ensure that new LIRs could still get some IPv4, instead of using it all up themselves.
There are numerous discussions in the address policy archives where IPv4 allocations were gradually made more restrictive to slow down the burn rate, whilst others advocated running out as quickly as possible in an attempt to force the deployment of, and transition to, IPv6.
Cheers, Rob
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...