Elad,

There is no cyber influence operation against you. Even though it’s popular these days, you’re olaying Trump with the whole mailing list.

I’m amazed, and you should be grateful, that there is so many positive criticism to your idea, and that it’s not just palinly dismissed.

But now the discussion has wasted enough bandwidth, green energy, and time. Let it rest, take it to other people and groups as was suggested, see if you can win them over.

Or put the same energy at pushing IPv6. In contrast to your idea, IPv6 is there and is a reality.

End of the disucssion for me.

Cheers

Michel

 
From: Elad Cohen <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io>
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 11:54 a.m.
To: Sander Steffann
Cc: Gert Döring; members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world
 
Sander is taking part in an illegal cyber influence operation against me.

Sander, instead of lying and acting like a coward with other interests, go ahead and ask me publicly any question that you would like regarding IPv4+ and you will be answered.

Respectfully,
Elad


From: Sander Steffann
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2020 12:40 PM
To: Elad Cohen
Cc: Gert Döring; members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Technical solution to resolve the IPv4 Exhaustion problem and to add more 4, 294, 967, 296 IPv4 addresses that are needed in the world

Hi,

> What being done here is a cyber influence operation against me, after I'm only trying to do good to the community.
>
> Sander, you didn't mention any flaws,  can you please write them here and I will answer each and every one of them ?

This is not the place Elad. Many flaws have been pointed out to you already, but you just dismiss them. Take this to the IETF, you'll feel right at home… *

Cheers,
Sander

* for those who don't follow the IETF, there is an appeal ongoing about IETF chairs and ADs ignoring inconvenient questions and objections