On Thu 11 Apr 2024 14:36:35 GMT, Daniel Pearson wrote:
Hi Denys,
Thank you for bringing forth this motion, I do not disagree with it on it's premise. I also fully agree with the call for RIPE to reduce its budget accordingly.
I would recommend one addition to your proposal.
"We suggest that RIPE NCC implement a weighed voting model based upon the number of resources billed to a LIR. This would ensure that a LIR is equally represented directly in relation to it's financial contribution to RIPE."
If such a motion is added, I'm sure those who will pay substantially higher amounts will not object to having one vote per billed subnet or a similar implementation.
So next year they can revert all the work and nobody will have enough vote to go against? -- Alarig