European countries are setting a target to avoid using fossil fuel-using vehicles by 2030-2035. To achieve this, they do not dictate vehicle owners to sell or dispose their vehicles immediately. However, just as they encourage other vehicles (Electric, H2O powered, etc..) with tax advantages, they are slowly discouraging fossil fuel vehicles with tax disadvantages.
Although I doubt the reasonableness of the steps of the EU they are taking, but I think that with encouragement and deterrence, the IPv4 -> IPv6 transition will gradually occur. Of course, if RIPE NCC takes the right steps.
Their efforts so far certainly do not serve this purpose.
I'm sure some resource owners will show resistance. For example, that they paid money to RIPE NCC when no one else was paying money (20-25 years ago ?!?), etc. However, as they paid this money, they got their reward from the end user, and they have benefited greatly from its cream in recent years.
It is now important that RIPE NCC introduces this into an equitable system.
The options they have offered in recent years only benefit BIG Players, only.. Proposals to the contrary never come from the GM...
I'm not a fan of destruction, I'm a fan of being constructive. However, in recent years, the GM has only been taking steps to eliminate small entrepreneurs (I'm sure this wasn't the direct goal, but unfortunately this is the outcome).
In my opinion, the most reasonable solution proposal among what I have seen so far in 2024 is the one offered by Sebastien. However, I am aware that it is necessary to consider whether this provides the budget in numbers.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Murat TERZIOGLU
PREBITS
Bochumer Str. 20
44866 Bochum
Deutschland
Telefon: 0234/58825994
Telefax: 0234/58825995
USt-ID: DE315418902
Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Kaj Niemi
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. April 2024 11:50
An: sdy@a-n-t.ru; Servperso <ml@servperso.com>
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net
Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Net neutrality is about treating data equally, without favoritism, by those who transport it. It isn't perfect as sometimes governments have some ideas on what needs to be blocked. Also, for operational reasons, transported data sometimes needs to be blocked, too. But most of the time things work.
What net neutrality is not is entertaining the idea of redistributing IPv4 addresses equally to everyone. Addresses were distributed on [shown] need in the past. All have been distributed a long time since, they're not coming back.
:)
Kaj
Sent from my iPad