21 Apr
2023
21 Apr
'23
8:54 a.m.
Randy, Maybe counting per IP rather than subnet size would be an option for a better granularity, a " simple formula " might do the trick. But a much higher top end is absolutely a need. Will On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 09:38:30AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
will,
I would like to support that comment from Clement, it seems to me that huge players will not get impacted much by this charging plans. As I see it, some small ISPs (let's say with a /19) will get charged a 4th of what an incumbent (3215,3320,3303) would pay for their IPs, as the cap is a /15.
would finer granularity in the step function, and a much higher top end address this issue sufficiently?
randy