Hi Fergal, Thank you for that clarification. As-such I think this entire proposal needs to be rejected and sent back to the board until a fourth option of no-change is added. Daniel~ On 4/10/24 7:54 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Dear Rob,
The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be rejected. It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same way as the Executive Board election is run. So members would be asked to vote for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round or second round would be deemed to have been chosen.
Hope that helps. Fergal
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:46 PM Rob Evans <rhe@nosc.ja.net> wrote:
Hi,
> Why do we not have an option that refuses any rate increases, and forces RIPE to reduce it's budget? > > Option D - No change to rates, RIPE reduces budget according to fewer number of LIR!
I believe that is implicit if options A, B and C are all voted down.
Rob
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...