On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 01:01:30PM +0100, Marcus Stoegbauer wrote:
In summary: task forces are formed to work out a goal, for which they require privacy. Minutes of the discussions and regular updates (if it’s a longer running process) can be sensible to keep the public informed, but with this task force the final report contained plenty of information. Additionally, the final report was presented to the members and there was a vote on the relevant passages, so I fail to see how damages could be done by this proceeding.
1) the members of RIPE NCC are not "the public", they are the *owners* of the NCC. Everyone would do well to keep this fact in mind. 2) Minutes and proceedings of a "task force" that undertakes to make changes to the governance of the NCC (such as to pre-select who may be elected to the Board) should *absolutely* be public. They are important information to help decide which way to vote on whatever AoA changes fall out of this. 3) The TF report did *not* contain "plenty of information", in fact it omitted the most important details - such as: who determines what constitutes "fraud or financial irregularities" and who determines that such exist, or who decides what makes a candidate ineligible for election to the EB. My impression from the GM is that these processes are still vague and largely unresolved. rgds, Sascha Luck