Sergey,

I don't believe I'm devaluing those who voted, I am, as Karl said, referencing the extremely close nature of the result. So I think it's fair to think that on a different day, the result might have been different. That is not me suggesting the vote was a waste of time (it absolutely wasn't) nor that we should run it again (we shouldn't!).

And it's not good that you felt under pressure, ofc, but I think the Board expressed their recommendation once, maybe twice, by email and at the GM? The other emails were reminders to vote. There are lessons to learn here, for sure, but the Board have to be able to act in the perfectly normal way they did and it would be, imo, a very bad idea if they were in any way restricted from doing so.

Brian

Brian Nisbet (he/him)
Head of Service Operations
Asiera (formerly HEAnet), Ireland's National Research and Education Network
North Dock Two, 93-94 North Wall Quay, Dublin 1, D01 V8Y6
+35316609040 brian.nisbet@asiera.ie www.heanet.ie www.asiera.ie
Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270
From: Sergey Myasoedov <kaa@net-art.cz>
Sent: Monday 22 June 2026 12:29
To: Brian Nisbet <brian.nisbet@asiera.ie>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Analysis on May 2026 GM
 
[You don't often get email from kaa@net-art.cz. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]

CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click on links or open the attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.


Brian,

> vote comes down to basically a coinflip

I think you are devaluing the value of 3000 votes and the signals received.

> My second point is that the NCC Board, like the Board of any company, have to have the opportunity to make a recommendation to the members on a resolution. That is perfectly normal Board activity and it is then up to the members to decide if we agree or not.

I don't think so. Given the numerous emails I received, I felt under pressure.


--
Best regards,
Sergey Myasoedov



> On 6/22/2026, at 12:49, Brian Nisbet via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
>
> Good Morning,
>
> I'd like to address two things here.
>
> Even though I disagree with your point/interpretation, Andy, I do understand how you got there. I would like to thank the NCC team for the write up and analysis, even though such analysis is so hard when the vote comes down to basically a coinflip. I think it's quite possible that on a different day the vote might go a different way, but I did not take the RIPE Labs piece as an attempt to re-run it. The membership have spoken and the matter should be settled for a decent period of time.
>
> My second point is that the NCC Board, like the Board of any company, have to have the opportunity to make a recommendation to the members on a resolution. That is perfectly normal Board activity and it is then up to the members to decide if we agree or not.
>
> Brian
>
> Brian Nisbet (he/him)
> Head of Service Operations
> Asiera (formerly HEAnet), Ireland's National Research and Education Network
> North Dock Two, 93-94 North Wall Quay, Dublin 1, D01 V8Y6
> +35316609040 brian.nisbet@asiera.ie www.heanet.ie www.asiera.ie
> Registered in Ireland, No. 275301. CRA No. 20036270From: brandon@bogons.net <brandon@bogons.net> on behalf of Brandon Butterworth <hostmaster@bogons.net>
> Sent: Friday 19 June 2026 18:13
> To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>
> Cc: Ilke Ilhan <iilhan@ripe.net>; Andy Davidson <Andy.Davidson@ask4.com>
> Subject: [members-discuss] Re: Analysis on May 2026 GM
>  CAUTION[External]: This email originated from outside of the organisation. Do not click on links or open the attachments unless you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
> On 19/06/2026 17:39:16, "Gert Doering" <gert@space.net> wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 10:34:55AM +0000, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
> >>  I read that as RIPE wanted B, that it is just the board saying it
> >>  does not mark it any less an organisational desire. Perhaps in these
> >>  matter all of RIPE should be neutral, after all the budget is the
> >>  same so it is purely a members choice no advocacy needed.
> >
> >Please be very precise with your terminology here.  *RIPE* has no say
> >whatsoever in financial matters.  There is the RIPE NCC, the RIPE NCC
> >executive board, and the RIPE NCC members.
>
> That confusion was my entire point.
>
> It appeared to be those offering a model choice preferred B,
> it was offered to vote by NCC and promoted by the board and
> the timing of the advocacy easily led one to read it as both
> were promoting it, where it should only be the membership that
> has an opinion on which is best.
>
> brandon
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe or manage your subscription, log in to the LIR Portal with your
> RIPE NCC Access account and go to the LIR Account page:
> https://my.ripe.net/#/account-details.
>
> Scroll down to Membership Mailing Lists to update your 'members-discuss' subscription.
>
> Having issues unsubscribing? More information about managing your subscription
> can be found at: https://www.ripe.net/s/members-discuss-subscription-options/
> To unsubscribe or manage your subscription, log in to the LIR Portal with your
> RIPE NCC Access account and go to the LIR Account page:
> https://my.ripe.net/#/account-details.
>
> Scroll down to Membership Mailing Lists to update your 'members-discuss' subscription.
>
> Having issues unsubscribing? More information about managing your subscription
> can be found at: https://www.ripe.net/s/members-discuss-subscription-options/