On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 23:29 Architecture Iq Data Srl <office@architekiq.ro> wrote:

Hi.

[...]

IPv6 was implemented by RIPE so well that their own employees left be became brokers (isn’t that like insider trading?).

Insider trading would have been if I would have stayed employed at the RIPE NCC and opened a brokerage company as a second job.

I did no such thing. I left the RIPE NCC many months before I started the IP brokerage business.

Please do not imply that I did insider trading, whatever you mean by that, ever again.

IPv6 had nothing to do with my decision to move on and try a new job/challenge. I am actually promoting IPv6 as much as I can.

We are now left with a marketplace to buy or sell IPs which is ridiculous because when you transfer an IP range it must not be in use, so how the hell can someone transfer a /16 or more ( if its not in use, means you are not using it, aren’t u supposed to give it back to RIPE?).

That is not true. We have brokered many transfers where the network using the IPs was still operational. There are many reasons why a transfer can occur, not just when IPs are not used and sold.

Transfers should have only been allowed if entire LIR/company was bought, which makes more sense.

That would have caused a nightmare to everyone. Companies reorganize, change focus, split, merge (sometimes partially).

[...]

The transfer market has been in existance since 2009-2011 (depending on the region) and it has served its purpose for thousands of companies. It still serves its purpose by making IPv4 available to those in need... it comes with a cost but if you want free IPs nobody is stoping you to use IPv6 and nat/cgnat/etc.

regards

—
Alex

cheers,

Elvis

On 27 Apr 2020, at 06:39, Ed Campbell <campbell@inca.ie> wrote:

I support this. He has taken to emailing me directly with his conspiracy theories.

Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Apr 2020, at 23:04, Cynthia Revström <me@cynthia.re> wrote:

Hello,

I would like to request that Elad Cohen be blocked from sending to the members-discuss mailing lists after multiple offtopic threads started by Elad and the personal attacks and ignoring WG chairs telling Elad to stop.

I would further like to point out that as he is a confirmed candidate for the Exec Board, one of his key responsibilities would be to have the "Ability to communicate effectively", which he has shown that he is not capable of.
I would personally say that elad lacks most of the expectations listed on https://www.ripe.net/about-us/executive-board/ripe-ncc-executive-board-functions-and-expectations.

I would like to propose that the RIPE NCC ban Elad Cohen from interacting with the RIPE Community (via Meetings or mailing lists) due to his blatant disregard for the Code of Conduct and for being hostile towards others in the community. As the RIPE NCC hosts and manages these lists I think the RIPE NCC has a responsibility to keep the lists professional and to remove those who repeatedly ignore what the WG chairs are saying.

- Cynthia
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/campbell%40inca.ie
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/office%40architekiq.ro

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elvis%40v4escrow.net