Absolutely agree!
This voting looks like manipulating.
NCC now works like not clear hand politicians.....
Serbulov Dmitry

> Hi,
>
>> The voting procedure is “instant run-off” which clearly benefits what
>> RIPE wants – Charging scheme A.
>
> Cards on the table: my LIR will see a substantial increase in our RIPE NCC
> service fees from the category-based model, but I do not believe the above
> is necessarily correct.
>
> To win, one of the charging schemes must get more than 50% of the vote.
>
> If we assume that more than 50% of the members want flat fee, but are
> evenly split between models B, C and D, then after the first round of
> voting, A will have 48% (say) of the votes, and the remaining 52% split
> between B, C and D.
>
> At that point, as nobody has > 50%, the lowest of B, C or D will be
> reallocated to their second preference votes.  Presumably most of those
> will also put another category-based option as their second preference.
>
> If you want flat fee, it’s probably important to rank B, C and D according
> to your preference, but include all of them.
>
> If you want category-based, then obviously vote for that. :)
>
> Cheers,
> Rob
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss@ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
>



_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/q%40as207960.net