PP, ---- You clearly do not care about ethics. You care about your own self good. ---- I assume that you are writing it because I don't follow your CoC, if the CoC doesn't apply to me why I need to follow it ? Almost a year ago Ronald Guilmette, the front person of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" created a post on me in the Anti-Abuse Working Group with names calling and lies and with antisemitic motives, only because I didn't agree to provide private business documents to the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" and because I found out who are the real people behind the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project". Ronald Guilmette was called an antisemitic regarding his proof-less and personal attack on me by someone which is not related to me (https://imgur.com/a/Rzrbxkz), all of it didn't make RIPE Executive Board or the co-chairs of the RIPE Anti Abuse Working Group to remove the post even that it heavily violated the CoC. RIPE Executive Board said that only the co-chairs of the Anti-Abuse working group can decide on removing the post, and Brian Nisbet the co-chair said that I need to provide to him the same private business documents that the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" tried to extort if I would like the antisemitic post to be removed. I also would like to add that one of the three co-chairs of that working group that didn't want to remove the proof-less antisemitic post (Tobias Knecht and also his partner from Abusix Thomas Szukala), are members of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" and they know the real identities of the people behind the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project"), in the past another co-chair of that working group was also a member of the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project", Richard D G Cox (https://www.scribd.com/document/445894312/Spamhaus-Illegal-Private-Data-Viol...). ------- All your conspiracy theories regarding the RIPE are ridiculous. We have actually had a completely opposite experience; when we raised awareness regarding the delegation of filtering to third parties and DNSBL, our concerns were taken seriously and the problem was obviously understood. An article was even posted very shortly afterwards. https://labs.ripe.net/Members/razvano/mail-filtering-rethinking-our-reliance... ------- Did RIPE took any action to create a real alternative to the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" ? No, and it will never happen. In the following link you can see an agenda of first event of a bigger group that the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" is part of, ISP's are also part of their bigger group, the abuse departments of ISP's, they will not use an alternative solution to spamhaus, because it is not only about spam, it is also about internet control and intelligence gathering/sharing: https://www.isotf.org/isoi.html ------- https://portal.ops-trust.net/ There is nothing interesting on that page. Where are your evidences that Spamhaus is in control of the RIPE? Also, where are your evidences that every member you have libeled is actually working for Spamhaus? ------- Besides https://portal.ops-trust.net/ here are two private presentations of them about Ops-Trust community: https://www.docdroid.net/xfaKhhY/f41lf3st2015-trident-toothed-and-pronged-pd... https://www.docdroid.net/xqTWVQW/first-2014-vixie-paul-op-sec-trust-pdf The illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" have no paid workers, they have members, such as any person in the main "Trust Group" (Ops-Trust community). ------- Some Spamhaus supporters have tried to obtain seats before, as far as I remember they've always flopped and that's good. ------- They don't need to have seats, they are a mob, Ops-Trust community have more than 1000 people, they are controlling behind the scenes. And according to their ways of actions you will never know that they are part of or related to or support the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project". ------- My guess is that you have been tricked by Spamhaus because of your incompetence, which likely resulted in Spamhaus obtaining personal details on you and posting them on their website. As a result you are now paranoid and see everyone who disagrees with you as a Spamhaus agent. Even though creating public profiles of people that Spamhaus deemed spammers was likely in violation of the GDPR. That is definitely not the core of the problem. ------- You are wrong, I'm not a spammer, the illegal anonymous organization "The Spamhaus Project" tried to extort from me private business documents and I disagree to provide them because they are criminals. Spamhaus don't need to obtain my personal details as they are known and actually I was the one that found out exactly their real identities and here they are: "Thomas Morrison" - is Daniel R. Thomas (https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~drt24/) "Pete Dawes" - is Ildiko Pete (https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~ip358/) "Vincent Hanna" - is Vincent Schonau (https://twitter.com/vschonau) "Natale Maria Bianchi" - is Maria Bada (https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mb2312/) "Rob Shultz" - is Rob McEwen (https://twitter.com/invaluement<https://twitter.com/invaluement>) "Mike Anderson" - is Michael O'Reirdan (http://cybersummit.info/2015/speakers/oreirdan) and Professor Ross J. Anderson (https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rja14/) ________________________________ From: Pavel Polyakov <p.polyakov+ripe@urdn.com.ua> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 12:06 AM To: Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Executive Board Election Task Force Members On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 17:49:29 +0000 Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
only because I care of the core values of the internet such as privacy
Cut the crap. You clearly do not care about ethics. You care about your own self good. All your conspiracy theories regarding the RIPE are ridiculous. We have actually had a completely opposite experience; when we raised awareness regarding the delegation of filtering to third parties and DNSBL, our concerns were taken seriously and the problem was obviously understood. An article was even posted very shortly afterwards. https://labs.ripe.net/Members/razvano/mail-filtering-rethinking-our-reliance...
and more about their illegal bigger secret group here:
There is nothing interesting on that page. Where are your evidences that Spamhaus is in control of the RIPE? Also, where are your evidences that every member you have libeled is actually working for Spamhaus? Some Spamhaus supporters have tried to obtain seats before, as far as I remember they've always flopped and that's good. My guess is that you have been tricked by Spamhaus because of your incompetence, which likely resulted in Spamhaus obtaining personal details on you and posting them on their website. As a result you are now paranoid and see everyone who disagrees with you as a Spamhaus agent. Even though creating public profiles of people that Spamhaus deemed spammers was likely in violation of the GDPR. That is definitely not the core of the problem. PP