Nice, but to be honest: the APNIC scheme seems quite fair to me. Why not adopt something that's been working well for another RIR? A self-assessment does not sound well thought-through. It will result in vague estimates instead of facts, facts, facts. And if the very large LIR does not comply, would RIPE really de-register it? I doubt it. But if payment is based on a simple formula, then the invoice will be an automated procedure. And in case a very large LIR has many unused ressources, the incentive is there to either return them, or assign them properly, or charge his customers properly - or simply don't care and pay. Regards, Olaf
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss- bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 2:45 PM To: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] is the self-assessment model really a good idea?
Hi,
what about "everybody who brings up the same arguments that have been here a number of times half a year ago pays 50x the normal fee"?
This should significantly lower the fees for everybody else.
Gert Doering -- troll
-- jacobi@ibh.de Tel. +49 351 477 77 21 sales@ibh.de Fax +49 351 477 77 29 www.ibh.de GSM +49 175 290 03 48 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Olaf Jacobi Leiter Internet-Vertrieb/-Marketing IBH IT-Service GmbH Amtsgericht Dresden Gostritzer Str. 67a HRB 13626 D-01217 Dresden GF: Prof. Dr. Thomas Horn Germany VAT DE182302907