Unfortunately. It is look like select between the kind of sheets for eat... But NCC must decide how to fill up budget. So it is wrong direction to talk now about simple reduce pays. I have next Idea for what to do: It is need to divide NCC budget to 'functional' part and 'investigation' part. Functionally part is only registration and finance function NCC, which fell up by equal for all members contribution, 'investigation' part is used for all other NCC functionality and fell up by payment for deficite resources.
Correct, but the question is: is it ok for the option to reject the proposed resolution to be missing ?
If it is ok, it means that the membership can be forced to adopt any resolution, just by having various similar options. This is a loophole that could be exploited for nefarious purposes.
If not, the vote as proposed is invalid.
To be clear: my intention is not to promote a rejection of the charging scheme. This is a more general concern. I find very suspicious to see a resolution proposal that can't be rejected, in the general meeting of a membership-based association.
Sebastien Brossier
On 11/04/2024 12:39, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Dear Sebastien,
According to Article 18.3 of the Articles of Association, if a proposed resolution contains various options, the method of instant run-off voting is used, as described in the same article (similar to the elections of EB members).
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-... <https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-voting>
Best regards, Fergal
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 10:52 AM Sebastien Brossier <sebastien@brossier.org <mailto:sebastien@brossier.org>> wrote:
On 10/04/2024 14:54, Fergal Cunningham wrote: > The vote for this proposal would not allow all options to be rejected. > It would be run with the instant run-off vote format in the same way as > the Executive Board election is run. So members would be asked to vote > for the three options in order of preference and the scheme that > achieves more than 50% of preferences either on the first round or > second round would be deemed to have been chosen.
Hi,
Is this even legal, wrt the articles of association ? Holding a vote to adopt an item, without a reject option.
Best regards, Sebastien Brossier
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.