Hello!<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Max Tulyev <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:president@ukraine.su" target="_blank">president@ukraine.su</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">&gt; With pay-per-IP model we have two options: 1) We can set fee really high<br>
&gt; to stimulate people to return their unused resources or even higher to<br>
&gt; force people to deploy CGNs and redesign networks in order to return<br>
&gt; resources that are currently in use.<br>
<br>
</div>Why and how will use this huge extra income form that fee, if this happens?</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well I do not know... I wanted to say that you can set fee high enough to really achieve some effects on address distribution but it brings a risk of deep and irreversible changes in the whole industry. Or you can set the fees low, which is not going to cause anything good or bad.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Tomas</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div>Tomáš Hlaváček</div><div>-------------------------------------------------</div><div>IGNUM s.r.o. | Vinohradská 190 | Praha 3 | 130 61</div><div><br></div>