No, you have one vote per LIR. Not per resource. -- Kind regards Sebastian Becker TELEKOM DEUTSCHLAND GMBH T Wholesale Sebastian Becker Global Peering Manager (AS3320) Landgrabenweg 149, 53227 Bonn, Germany +49 170 2224049<tel:+491702224049> (Mobil) sebastian-becker@telekom.de<mailto:sebastian-becker@telekom.de> wholesale.telekom.com<https://wholesale.telekom.com/> [signatureImage] The compulsory statement can be found here: www.telekom.com/compulsory-statement<http://www.telekom.com/compulsory-statement> ________________________________ Von: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net> Gesendet: Friday, February 6, 2026 4:28:34 PM An: Becker, Sebastian <Sebastian-Becker@telekom.de>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>; info@albahost.net <info@albahost.net> Cc: michal@krajcirovic.cz <michal@krajcirovic.cz> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] Re: Charging Scheme Model Consultation: Phase 2 - comments As far as I understand members already enjoy equal voting rights. Kaj Sent from my iPhone ________________________________ From: Sebastian-Becker@telekom.de <Sebastian-Becker@telekom.de> Sent: Friday, February 6, 2026 5:19 PM To: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>; info@albahost.net <info@albahost.net> Cc: michal@krajcirovic.cz <michal@krajcirovic.cz> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Re: Charging Scheme Model Consultation: Phase 2 - comments Does your idea also include equal voting rights to the amount of the payment per resource? Like one vote for each /24? -- Kind regards Sebastian Becker ________________________________ Von: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net> Gesendet: Freitag, Februar 6, 2026 4:07 PM An: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>; AlbHost SH.P.K <info@albahost.net> Cc: Michal Krajčírovič <michal@krajcirovic.cz> Betreff: [members-discuss] Re: Charging Scheme Model Consultation: Phase 2 - comments Uniform pricing for membership fees would align well with procedural fairness. That is, the same price exists for everyone and there aren't any discounts. If you have discounts someone will always find a special interest group, that they should be entitled to it for whatever reason, and so on and on and on. Kaj ________________________________ From: AlbHost SH.P.K via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2026 18:52 To: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Cc: Michal Krajčírovič <michal@krajcirovic.cz> Subject: [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Model Consultation: Phase 2 - comments Dear colleagues, I would like to explicitly support Michal’s position, in particular regarding the proposed discounts for educational institutions, and add an important practical aspect to this discussion. Many universities and similar institutions received extremely large IPv4 allocations in the past—often /16 or even multiple /16 blocks. In a significant number of cases, only a very small fraction of these resources (sometimes just one to three /24s) is actually used for their own operational needs today. At the same time, it is publicly observable that IPv4 address space originating from such legacy allocations is being sold or transferred on the open market via platforms such as ipv4.global, at fully commercial prices (currently on the order of ~30 EUR per IPv4 address). This is not speculation; it is an established and RIPE-compliant transfer market. In this context, granting fee reductions to organisations that: * hold vast historical IPv4 resources, * use only a minimal portion of them operationally, and * monetise the remainder at market prices, is difficult to justify from a fairness perspective. If educational institutions are to benefit from discounted RIPE fees, this should at minimum be conditional upon the substantial return of unused IPv4 address space to the free pool. Without such a mechanism, the proposed model effectively rewards address hoarding while shifting the financial burden onto smaller commercial LIRs, start-ups, and non-profit-adjacent organisations that must both pay full RIPE fees and acquire IPv4 addresses at full market cost. Absent meaningful IPv4 reclamation, fee discounts for organisations already in possession of disproportionately large legacy allocations appear inequitable and inconsistent with the stated principles of efficient and fair resource distribution. Kind regards, Mentor L. -- Sinqerisht / Sincerely, AlbHost [Logo]<https://www.albahost.net/> AlbHost SH.P.K. Besim Beka p.n. 50000 Gjakovë, Kosovë. NIPT/VAT ID: 811442657 T: +383900501502 E: info@albahost.net<mailto:info@albahost.net> W: wWw.AlbaHost.Net<http://www.albahost.net/> [Facebook icon]<https://www.facebook.com/albanianhosting> [Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/albahost> [Instagram icon] <https://www.instagram.com/albahost_vpn/> [Banner] Përmbajtja e këtij emaili është konfidenciale dhe ka për qëllim marrësin e specifikuar vetëm në mesazh. Ndalohet rreptësisht shpërndarja e ndonjë pjese të këtij mesazhi me ndonjë palë të tretë, pa pëlqimin me shkrim të dërguesit. Nëse e keni marrë këtë mesazh gabimisht, ju lutemi përgjigjuni këtij mesazhi dhe ndiqni me fshirjen e tij, në mënyrë që të sigurohemi që një gabim i tillë të mos ndodhë në të ardhmen. The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.
