22 Apr
2024
22 Apr
'24
12:02 p.m.
On 20/04/2024 11:44, Claudius Zingerli wrote:
I think IPv6 allocations larger than /29 aren't very common. Your proposal again puts too much load on smaller LIRs. I generated this alternate simulation to address the concerns of those with IPv6 /29 and a very small amount of IPv4, but it is indeed worse for everyone else. Billing IPv6 in a fair way is not easy when 90% of LIRs are in the same category.
Honestly, I prefer my initial proposal. Or James A.T. Rice's proposal if we're not going to charge for IPv6 at the moment. Sebastien Brossier