What if the IPv6 is used privately? I mean we have a /29 and we have used some of it for internal infrastructure on networks, that are currently not linked to upstream IPv6 provider. Are we in danger of loosing our current IPv6 allocation? Marian On 10/16/19 1:41 PM, Paul Thornton wrote:
Hi Gert,
On 15/10/2019 22:46, Gert Doering wrote:
I am fairly sure there is more to this than "just because receiving party already had a /29" - nothing in the policies would forbid that.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster
As a datapoint, I certainly have been on the receiving end of this.
Consider this scenario: LIR X has an existing /29, and LIR Y has a /32. Closing LIR Y and transferring all resources to LIR X triggered just such a question.
I know that >/29 allocations are of course allowed - I think the issue arises when an LIR has their whole "initial largest" /29 allocation and then adds more through acquisition or transfer.
Paul.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mm%401h.com
-- Marian Marinov Founder & CEO of 1H Ltd. Jabber/GTalk: hackman@jabber.org ICQ: 7556201 IRC: hackman @ irc.freenode.net Mobile: +359 886 660 270