28 Sep
2020
28 Sep
'20
2:45 p.m.
Gert wrote:
When we looked at possible software options for our RPKI validator, we compared performance, memory, robustness, agility of development, and this all concluded in "this was nice as a demonstration vehicle, but I do not want to run it near a any production system, ever".
The real issue is: a lot of network operators do NOT have the time for this kind of assessment. They make a judgement call based on the good overall reputation of RIPE (and as Erik mentioned: training) and just go with it. I agree and support sunsetting the development of the RIPE RPKI validator. -- lukas