With a charging scheme based on resources, a /32 is bound to be cheaper than a /29. Even so, a small LIR with a /29 would still pay less than with the current charging scheme. It is possible to put less charges on IPv6 by increasing Offset_IPv6, but it would need to be compensated by an increase in Base_Fee and it would be less proportional. On 16/04/2024 16:37, Mihail Fedorov wrote:
I once again advise to put less charges on IPv6. Genrally it’s a good and correct approach. But in current reality this will result need to restructure v6 subnets for everyone, who opted into /29 but using /32 (which is what many small LIRs do) and create additional work for everyone. In some distant future there will be no difference but for now every occasion to motivate networks to have IPv6 should be valued.