Why?  Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused
PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them
lie around, unused.  If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just
to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back.

No because it will charge the same for a /16 as for a /24. And it’s not fair that after you pay 4k euros for a /24 to pay 50 euros more yearly, unlike some older LIRs that paid next to nothing for a /20 let’s say. 

If we keep option B we might as well divide the LIRs into two separate types:


Thanks
—






Petru Bunea / CEO  / +40752481282

Bunea TELECOM / DATACENTER / APP DEVELOPMENT
http://www.bunea.eu / +40745495495


On 17 Apr 2019, at 23:06, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 10:42:15PM +0300, Andrejs Guba wrote:
So i repeat. It will be interesting to listen to someone who can describe
his logic in proposed scheme B.

I didn't propose it, but I like scheme B.

Why?  Because it creates incentives to return unused ASNs, unused
PI assignment (or sell them off), etc - instead of just having them
lie around, unused.  If you *need* something, 50 EUR is ok, but "just
to have it", it might be annoying enough to give it back.

(I returned one of my ASNs when they did still cost money, back before
we changed the charging scheme last time - exactly because)

Gert Doering
       -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/suport%40bunea.eu