4 Aug
2011
4 Aug
'11
10:39 a.m.
On 08/03/2011 12:46 PM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
Why should an LIR having a /16 (I assume you mean /16 not /18) pay more than an LIR having a /17? Does it cost more for RIPE to support the LIR with a /16 than the LIR with a /17? Possibly the answer is yes, but it's not because they have a /17 rather than a /16.
One of expected RIPE NCC tasks is analysing proper use of allocated resources by each LIR. Mainly, this happens when LIR asks for new resources - but also in other case like LIR audits. And analysis of /16 block is more exacting than /17 analysis. Mentioned audits aren't classic LIR support - members usually doesn't ask for their audits and of course, these audit costs some money :-) With regards, Daniel