Hi,
does it
mean, that everything decided before, should be correct and
legitim? Either science is not so. They thought the world
was flat and so on…
So you
can not take everything as non changeable facts.. And here
there many things, that they are from stone age.
And i am
free not to accept the applicable and proposed charging
schemes.
I find
that it is not fair. If RIPE is a organisation, which
affects our freedom of our internet usage, than they should
handle fair
Many
people dont and can not contribute. Because of many
aspecsts, like language barriers of them etc. The desicions
will be done often from very small part of the community,
often as i see in the last years, for their own interests (i
realize this is a generalization, but generally)..
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Murat TERZIOGLU
PREBITS
Bochumer
Str. 20
44866
Bochum
Deutschland
Telefon:
0234/58825994
Telefax:
0234/58825995
www.prebits.de
info@prebits.de
USt-ID:
DE315418902
Of
course the people at RIPE made mistakes.
May I remind you that address policy is
decided in the working group of the same name, by the RIPE
Community and not the RIPE NCC? RIPE Community is all of
us, you included.
RIPE NCC implements the policies the
Community decides.
In
the old days they issued /8, /12, /14, /16, /18, /20
without any justification and demand for IP
addresses.
If you refer to the days before RIPE
policies, then looking back from today, yes some
assignments were quite generous, because it wasn’t
envisioned that the Internet would become what it is
today.
But as long as I can remember (and I’m
not the youngest anymore!), policies were always there,
and no, getting IP addresses was _not_ free beer for all.
CIO
at LU-CIX Management G.I.E.
Luxchat:
@3eb2pdflrq57:01.lu-cix.luxchat.lu
Phone:
(+352) 28 99 29 92-81
