Let’s look at why ripe are limiting LR’s to a final /22
1.
To ensure new members get a fair share of resources from the last /8 ?
If the above is correct then the ability to register additional LR’s for the sole reason to get additional /22 could be seen to abuse
the very reason why ripe put the limit in the first place.
This does not protect resources but makes ripe a lot more money.
Why have a rule in place then allow loop holes. You might had not bothered limiting LR’s to a /22 just charge XXX for an additional
/22 if that is the true reason why ripe came out with the rule.
From: members-discuss [mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net]
On Behalf Of Jonathan Nguyen
Sent: 21 July 2016 17:59
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Sign-up fee for additional LIR account
If you can't afford the measly few thousand euros for another LIR, perhaps you shouldn't be an LIR in the first place. I would keep prices as they are.
Jonny
On Thursday, July 21, 2016, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 06:08:02PM +0200, Ping IP wrote:
> I'm not talking about the sign-up fee for a new LIR member, but about
> the sign-up fee for an additional LIR account.
I think the sign-up fee being equal for all sorts of LIR accounts is
a very good thing, and the total amount is reasonable.
So, NCC, please leave things as they are.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
--
Jonathan "Jon" Nguyen
Owner, Nguyen Web Company
c: +1 (603) 952-7740
Email communications are confidential and intended for direct recipients and/or their authorized affiliate and/or personnel. As a disclaimer, emails received to
jnguyen@nguyenwebcompany.net may be archived and/or made accessible to Nguyen Web Company administrators.