Not agree with you. 1. NAT technology and working through it software grow up on with 25 years. 2. Current Network management, Security and Privacy model in IPv4 much lucky then in IPv6 for me. The most problem is that there is no economic or regulatory stimulus for ALL migration to IPv6. Big resource holders have interests to froze situation. We need regulation or economic stimulus to move to IPv6. In economic - it is pay more for each IPv4. In regulation? ОК - let's for 5 years politics start each LIR return each year 10% of IPv4 to unused space. Do you like it? --- Dmitry Serbulov
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
And stop looking at everyone's personal interests! The question now is how to break the global dead end with rising costs and lack of access to resources.
There is no way to fix the "lack of IPv4 addresses". Not with less IPv4 addresses available (even if 100% utilized) than there are number of people on this planet. IPv4 blocks can be distributed around differently, and then someone else will complain louder - and inevitably, costs will rise, as long as the Internet is growing, and people rely on IPv4.
Nothing of this is news, and it's not like we didn't tell this to people for more than 20 years.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.