On 23.09.2016 10:08, Ondřej Caletka wrote:
On 22.9.2016 v 23:07 Carlos Friacas wrote:
Tunnels? seriously? no, please...
End-users shouldn't care about which IP version they are using.
+1 +1
[snip] Maybe a better idea would be to create a fund for financial support of IPv6 deployments of providers, especially the big ones. Because most of them have no real technical problems, they just deliberately postpone the IPv6 adoption unless inevitable. The main idea is the later they deploy it, the less money it would cost. They don't have any actual need to deploy it, unless, say, YouTube stops playing HD videos to IPv4 clients. (That would be cool, actually.)
I'm fully aware that any such support will be unfair to all those that already used their own money to deploy IPv6. But on the other hand, deploying IPv6 at big providers is in the interest of the RIPE community as a whole.
I'd rather give the money to Google and other large content providers and ask them to stop supporting IPv4. Then let the big telcos deploy IPv6 because finally they will have to unless they want to lose all their customers. Not saying that this is a good idea though... Regards, Tom
Best Regards, Ondřej Caletka CESNET
---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/
Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.