27 Jul
2012
27 Jul
'12
1:20 p.m.
It is a good idea to read that law closely. May be they forget to point what *exactly* static IP should be provided to each contract. If yes - then assigning a static *IPv6* address and NATed private IPv4 is legal enough ;) 27.07.12 13:33, Paolo Di Francesco написав(ла):
We had a static IP - I also had a phoneline and Internet from WIND (Or Telecom Italia) under another contract which had *no* IP and was NATed (Hell, even multilevel NAT....)
As I said, it's a national law against terrorism. Yes you can do some form of NAT (afaik Fastweb does it) but you must do a "one customer NAT" with is quite long to explain.
But the law says "one contract = one public IP".
Long story anyway I can explain in private if you are curious ;)