I don't think a ~24hour moderation delay is appropriate during a voting period. It's annoying and slows the conversation at normal times but I accept it'd eat staff time so we live with that as the list is usually silent anyway. However during voting it may affect a vote outcome. For a few days during voting perhaps move some resource into this?
From members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net Thu May 25 13:17:43 2023 Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 14:50:59 +0100 From: Brandon Butterworth <hostmaster@bogons.net> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 May 2023 14:15:55 +0200 Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024 Cc: "members-discuss@ripe.net" <members-discuss@ripe.net> Sender: "members-discuss" <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>
On Wed May 24, 2023 at 12:05:20PM +0200, Q Misell via members-discuss wrote:
You have misunderstood how IRV/STV works. If the majority are against charging scheme A, but are otherwise split across the other charging schemes IRV will ensure that scheme A does not win. <trimmed>
brandon