It wouldn't. 

But it would help RIPE NCC budgets and lift some of the burden from smaller LIRs. 



On Apr 26, 2024 18:59, Ondrej Zajicek <santiago@crfreenet.org> wrote:

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 05:16:15PM +0200, Michel Lanners wrote:
> Can we stop discussing (and believing) that high costs for IPv4 would lead to enough IPv4 being returned to make everybody happy?
>
> That will never be the case! There simply isn’t enough IPv4, so let’s stop riding that dead horse!

This is a strawman argument. Putting economic pressure on holding IPv4
addresses is not supposed to push for its returns nor to 'make everyone
happy'. It is supposed to push for economic usage of limited resource by,
say, leasing or selling of unused or marginally used addresses. That does
not make everyone happy, but could lead to overall better distribution
and less waste.

--
Ondrej 'Santiago' Zajicek (email: santiago@crfreenet.org)
"To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so."

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/omer%40chronos.com.tr