exactly IP address is not the property of a company that was established in the 1980s or 1990s. When Ripe was so rigorous, he did not think about the use of IP addresses and gave them away because he had them. An IP address is a social good and should be available equally to everyone Pozdrawiam/Best Regard's Gabriel Sulka -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of Mihail Fedorov Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 8:19 PM To: ivaylo <ivaylo@bglans.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available Is this discussion about RIPE fee plans or about IPv4 usage? That’s 2 different questions :-) My opinion both can be solved by fee identical to the number v4 in use, for example 1 USD year per /32 address. If someone (presumably big company) wants to keep their bag of /8’s - they should be actually using them. When IP is in use that’s fair to assume it’s generating income and that 1 USD per used address is not a problem at all. And if someone wants just to keep big subnet because it was given to them on early days of internet - this will become indeed expensive and it will motivate to return/sell some. Outcome 1: small eyeball networks will be able to get at least /24 without astronomical investment and/or 2 year wait and pay just 254 USD for account. Outcome 2: Big ISPs and companies will pay significantly larger fee (yet literally nothing for them) and RIPE income will be much bigger. Addresses is not asset which should be kept and accounted in company “balance”. Policy always assumed fair *use*, not fair *keep*. Same way domains require small fee per each making keeping thousands not in use a bit expensive.
On 29 Mar 2024, at 20:05, ivaylo <ivaylo@bglans.net> wrote:
1 LIR = 1 Vote
If you want 2 Votes, always can register other company as LIR. And you again will pay 1500 euro and have same resource limits (before next step up = +1500):
1 x /20 IPV4 block 1 x /29 IPV6 block 8 ASNs
If we have more than 1 Vote for a LIR, based on the fee (fee: 4500, have 3 Votes), that will lead to monopol, mastodont companies will do what they want will vote and accept decisions only for their interests. And I can not call it democracy nor fair for all.
Ivaylo Josifov VarnaIX / Varteh LTD +359 52 969393 Varna, Bulgaria
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Evgeniy Brodskiy wrote:
Confidential/?????????????
Hi Ivaylo, just to clarify, if some LIR pay for 2 chank of resource does it mean it has 2 votes ?? If contribution is not equal why votes should be equal ??
----------------- Best regards,
Evgeniy Brodskiy Kyivstar | Network engineer Kyiv, Ukraine
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of ivaylo Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 4:54 PM To: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available
[????? ?????????? ????? ???????????? ??????? ????????? ?????????? ????? ??? ivaylo@bglans.net. ??????????, ???? ?? ???????: https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
Every Year we talking same things and every year the result is zero...
Clearly it is not fair company which holds /22 IPV4 /32 IPV6 and few ASN to pay same amount as a company with /8 IPV4 /20 IPV6 and tens (if not hundreds) ASNs.
Clearly charging scheme based on the holded resource not accepting. Well then why not we think about hard coded resource limits for each member:
Annual fee of 1500 Euro per LIR gives : 1 x /20 Block of IPV4 (sum can be 16 x /24 or 4 x /22) 1 x /29 Block of IPV6 (sum can be 8 x /32...) 8 x ASNs
If a LIR pass one or more of the above parameters the applied Annual fee +1500 Euro, so such LIR can hold and manage:
2 x /20 Block of IPV4 (sum) 2 x /29 Block of IPV6 (sum) 16 x ASN
If again pass one or more of these +1500 Euro and so on.
RIPE to send emails to each member with calculation for its next year fee, and with ask to free resources and return back to RIPE. Newly freed resources to be spread across members who not reach the first target (or at least to can ask for new resources without additional fee):
1 x /20 Block of IPV4 (sum can be 16 x /24 or 4 x /22 e.t.c.) 1 x /29 Block of IPV6 (sum can be 8 x /32... e.t.c) 8 x ASNs
To legacy resource holders to be given 1 year, to find sponsoring LIR, and their resources to be counted in the LIR account sum resources. Or to be asked to become LIRs, with 500 euro one pay joining fee.
This way RIPE can predict and calculate its bugdet much better.
Ivaylo Josifov VarnaIX / Varteh LTD +359 52 969393 Varna, Bulgaria
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024, Firma KOMPEX wrote:
Hi
it would be fair if the resource was not valued as a resource only as the number of IPs IP should be the basis for settlement - it is actually a cost there is a shortage of addresses, and some people have a lot of them unused and do not return them. If they paid for the addresses and it was a cost for them, they would wonder whether they really need them or whether it would be better to return some of them.
Pozdrawiam Gabriel Sulka
------------------------------------------------------------- Firma Handlowo - Us?ugowa KOMPEX 34-400 Nowy Targ ul. Szaflarska 62A tel(18) 264-60-55 pn-pt 09:30 - 17:00 sb. 09:30 - 13:00 http://www.k/ ompex.pl%2F&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C9925aa0 ba c9844e2301e08dc500035da%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7 C6 38473209301289732%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIj oi V2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vRog6o P4 cUl4jHHJwJtNmslrzbOIHlONn0zSTZyVOW8%3D&reserved=0 ; bok@kompex.pl ; kompex@nowytarg.net
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 12:49 PM To: domain@wkey.it Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 07:04:30PM +0100, Andrea Borghi wrote:
My humble proposal is to class basing on how many additional resources a company have beyond the basics that was valid at the time of joining Ripe.
... and possibly how old these resources are... we got our blocks in 1995/1996, and they are considered "large" by today's standards. Back then, it was what you got as a fast-growing small ISP...
So if we really go for something based on allocation size, adding a yearly depreciation factor in would make this "more fair" (... we've been paying our share for the last 29(!) years already).
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg en iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C9925aa0bac9844e2301e08dc500035da%7Cf8f9 bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638473209301298466%7CUnknown%7C TW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC I6 Mn0%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=zGN5MtVkwMRKjIKh8U8zUxrmFFkQrZJ4eiuEv% 2B RKwu8%3D&reserved=0 Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fivaylo%2540bglans .n et&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C9925aa0bac9844e2 30 1e08dc500035da%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63847320 93 01303571%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzI iL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C60000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=p4kryouKS1u%2F% 2F mNi3sDc3friXMlh5MIiUrR8nVxR5m0%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyi vstar.net
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mihail%40fedoro v.net
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/gabi%40kompex.pl