Hi,

Again I apologize for contacting you (Gert) about a /22 that you have taken from the last /8 more than 2 years ago and which was never announced in the internet (according to ripestat). Probably you didn't need it since you've got on the same LIR a different /22 only 5 days before that one. 

I didn't contact you regarding the PI block that you're also not using for more than a year. 

As a chair of the APWG you might want to be transparent about it and let us know what was the procedure based on which the IPs (from the last /8) allocated on april 17th 2014 to Transnet were moved to Spacenet only 2 weeks later ?

So what I can see is that you have got 2 x /22s from the last /8, moved one quickly to the main company so you won't have to pay membership fees and then you just keep one of them unused ever since you've got it. And this is what the cair of APWG does. 

When I, a broker, contact specifically the users that actually sit on millions of unused IP addresses, I'm the big criminal. Who am I really disturbing ? I recon those who just sit on IPs and try to drive prices up. 

Ciprian


On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 06:12:05PM +0300, Ciprian Nica wrote:
> First of all, I have not used the ripe database contact info to send
> marketing, advertising or anything to promote a service or product.

You have.  I have received your mail to an address that is exclusively
used in the RIPE database (as a notify: in our maintainers).  There is
no other place that would make a connection between the /22 in question
and *that* mail address.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279