On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 01:53:39PM +0000, Christoph Neukirch wrote:
There's no reason I can imagine beside exploitation of the rules to have more than one LIR in one organization.
There are many reasons I don't even have to imagine. - large companies with multiple organisational units which are not separate legal entities, yet run their own LIRs. - A company spinning off a business unit and wanting to establish a LIR prior to making it a separate entity. - A LIR buying another and running 2 LIRs in parallel at least until they finished their re-organisation. This scenario may not be affected but I'd like to have some clarity about that.
So what could be a valid reason to postpone this decision for 2 weeks?
Generally it is a good idea to sit down and think some before making knee-jerk decisions that regulate into the business affairs of members. Especially for a monopoly provider. rgds, Sascha Luck