Jerome,

How do you make the difference between a LIR transferring a /22 to another LIR for money, and a LIR really merging with another LIR ?
You would have to ask for papers about the merger and to know the M&A contractual aspects of each country in Europe.

David Ponzone  Direction Technique
tel:      01 74 03 18 97
gsm:   06 66 98 76 34

Service Client IPeva
tel:      0811 46 26 26

Ce message et toutes les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Tout message électronique est susceptible d'altération. IPeva décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce message s'il a été altéré, déformé ou falsifié. Si vous n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire immédiatement et d'avertir l'expéditeur.




Le 18 févr. 2016 à 00:45, Jérôme Nicolle <jerome@ceriz.fr> a écrit :

Hi Niels,

Le 17/02/2016 16:17, Kampen, Niels van a écrit :
Could be as easy as making the initial /22 of a LIR non-transferable?

This is one of the smartest things i've read all day, thank you for that.

I do agree that the initial /22 assigned to a new LIR should not be
allowed for transfer, no matter the context (merge ?).

We'll all be better off if the acquisition of a new /22 to be
re-integrated into an existing LIR's pool should be more expensive
thanit's facial market value.

So let's forbid new LIRs from transfer before, well, at least 5 years,
that should help with regulating this mess.

Best regards,

--
Jérôme Nicolle
+33 6 19 31 27 14

----
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:
https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/

Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.