On 10/03/2026 23:36:34, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
I completely disagree with you.
Good, I know that I am too accepting of the imposed futilty of arguing for a linear scheme. For the reasons you highlight I don’t see it happening.
You claim IPv4 is closed.
Yes, they don’t make it any more so people can fight over the scraps or move on.
Then explain to us why the market price of one IP address is already reaching $50? Why don't we see free resources, only rising prices?
It has halved since that peak and seems to still be declining as more reduce their use and sell off, and parts for old cars still sell even though new cars are for sale, some will drive the old car until it disintegrates.
The schemes proposed by the working group not only create inequality among NCC participants
Agreed, hence we’ve voted for the fixed fee so far. brandon