16 Feb
2016
16 Feb
'16
4:02 p.m.
On 16.02.16 14:46, Thomas Mangin wrote:
1. Is the activity of members opening additional LIR accounts a problem that must be prevented?
It is. The RIPE NCC policies should be written in a way which is beneficial to its community.
It is NOT. The problem is not a secondary LIR account itself, but an additional /22 allocated to same company. So quick way is to change policy and say every *COMPANY* should receive one /22, not every *LIR*. P.S. By the way, if there are several LIR accounts binded to one company, how many votes do that company have at General Meeting?