We are trying to find a diplomatic way to suggest that larger organisations can afford to contribute more because they can defray the cost over more clients.

We have only have 210 clients, so cost per capita is quite significant.

Paul.
F4RN

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, 13:58 Michel Lanners, <michel.lanners@lu-cix.lu> wrote:
Dear all,

Why on earth is everybody trying to monetize IPv4, i.e. make RIPE fees dependant on IPv4 ressources?

I completely fail to see why anybody should pay more for HOLDING any number of IPv4 ressources (or other ressources, by the way).

It’s a different story for ressource transfers. So let those selling IPv4 pay a fee for the transfer! 

And for the rest let’s stick to a real membership fee: one price irrespective of which services you use or not. The fitness center doesn’t charge you per minute, nor per device you use. It's a flat membership, full stop. Hopefully low enough so it doesn’t create a problem for anybody's bottom line.

Cheers

Michel LANNERS
CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E.
--
Luxchat: @3eb2pdflrq57:01.lu-cix.luxchat.lu
Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81
 
LU-CIX Management G.I.E.
202, Z.A.E. Wolser F
L-3290 Bettembourg

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/paul.newton%40f4rn.org.uk