Hi, On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:12:47AM +0300, Aleksey Bulgakov wrote:
I would argue that we have policies that work amazingly well for a very diverse membership structure across very different countries in the RIPE land.
Do you really think so? I think they brings more problems only. Sometimes it would be better to stop to cure the patient due to it's simpler (about trying to save the rest of IPv4).
So what exactly do you find not to your liking? - it is hard and/or expensive to get a big block of IPv6 addresses? - it is complicated and/or expensive to get an AS number? I assume that you complain that you cannot have as many IPv4 addresses as you want. I'm sorry, *this* is something address policy cannot fix, as we cannot magically create more than 32 bits of IPv4 space. The plain fact that you *can* get a /22 for a new LIR is what I consider a success of the policy process - imagine what you'd do today if we did not have a "last /8" policy that put aside a significant chunk of addresses to precisely enable you to have something today. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279