Michele,


Let me clarify, because this is not a question of “no rules.”


My position is straightforward:


A registry is a registry.

Its mandate is to maintain accurate records—nothing more.

You do not use an address book as an instrument of punishment.


When a registry begins using essential administrative functions to reward or punish individuals, the system becomes unpredictable and open to abuse. This is, in fact, a major reason the RIR environment has struggled with instability and governance issues: registries have, at times, stepped outside their neutral role and attempted to use resource administration as leverage.


Rules absolutely must exist, and compliance is essential.

But those rules are defined and enforced by sovereign law—courts, regulators, and proper authorities—not by a voluntary address book. A registry cannot impose its own rules above nations, nor can it act as police, prosecutor, and judge.


Punishment, when warranted, must come through established legal channels. A registry that assumes enforcement powers beyond its mandate ultimately undermines its own legitimacy and the trust of the global community.


That is the core of my position.


Regards,

Lu





On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 16:19 Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> wrote:
Lu 

Sorry but I cannot agree with your position on this. 

By your logic RIPE NCC would have zero right to take action against a member who was in breach of the policies, rules etc., 

Trust in the system is only possible when the system is stable and predictable, which you seem to agree with, however if there are no rules then any system will be abused by somebody at some point. 

Regards

Michele

--

Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting, Colocation & Domains

https://www.blacknight.com/

https://blacknight.blog/

Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072

Personal blog: https://michele.blog/

Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

 

I have sent this email at a time that is convenient for me. I do not expect you to respond to it outside of your usual working hours.

From: Lu Heng <h.lu@anytimechinese.com>
Date: Wednesday, 10 December 2025 at 13:15
To: Brett Sheffield <ripe@gladserv.com>
Cc: Sergey Myasoedov via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net>
Subject: [members-discuss] Re: Systematic RIPE DB abuse

[EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources.

Hi

I agree entirely NCC should not do anything. A registry’s role is administrative, not enforcement. Asking a bookkeeping-type institution to police behavior is simply outside its mandate and purpose.


There are countless legitimate ways to address concerns or resolve disputes. But withholding a fundamental registry service—such as assigning an address—because someone “did or did not do X” is irrational and unprecedented. It is the equivalent of a government refusing to give a home an address instead of contacting law enforcement or using proper legal channels. No responsible system operates that way, and no credible governance framework treats essential registry functions as a tool for punishment or leverage.


A registry should remain neutral, predictable, and strictly procedural. Using it as an enforcement mechanism undermines trust in the entire system.



--
Kind regards.
Lu



On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 14:38 Brett Sheffield <ripe@gladserv.com> wrote:
On 2025-12-08 12:57, Sergey Myasoedov via members-discuss wrote:
> Dear RIPE NCC members,
>
> I’d like to raise the topic of introducing and applying administrative anti-spam measures against RIPE NCC members who deliberately violate Article 4 of the RIPE Database Terms and Conditions.
>
> RIPE NCC requires members to publish up-to-date contact email addresses in the RIPE DB. However, these publicly listed addresses are actively harvested and used for spam by IPv4 brokers and address traders, while RIPE NCC does not take any measures to protect members from this type of abuse.
>
> This issue has been around since the IPv4 market appeared, and although it’s well known, at some point the RIPE NCC staff chose not to act against members who don’t follow the RIPE Database T&C.
>
> My proposal is to freeze transfer operations for members who are repeatedly abusing the RIPE Database.
>
> I’d be glad to hear your thoughts and discuss this further.

Compared to other sources, our RIPE contact address gets a tiny amount of spam,
and all of it from IPv4 brokers.

I've now received more emails in this single thread in the past 24 hours than I
have spam to our RIPE contact address in the past 5 years. No action from RIPE
is required here.

Tighten your spam controls if this is a problem for you, and lets move on.

Cheers,


Brett
--
Brett Sheffield (he/him)
Gladserv
To unsubscribe or manage your subscription, log in to the LIR Portal with your
RIPE NCC Access account and go to the LIR Account page:
https://my.ripe.net/#/account-details.

Scroll down to Membership Mailing Lists to update your 'members-discuss' subscription.

Having issues unsubscribing? More information about managing your subscription
can be found at: https://www.ripe.net/s/members-discuss-subscription-options/