Thread: https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/thread/RSMA2KYFGXCECYFJVDPQKWVD6MELXZYQ/


Hi Thomas,

There is precedent in national courts treating IP addresses as attachable assets (e.g. Amtsgericht Hamburg, case 67a M 93/19, and OLG Wien, case 3 R 195/14y). The difficulty is that RIPE NCC, under Dutch law, considers them contractual “rights of use” and will only act on a Dutch court order.

In practice, creditors either secure a voluntary transfer from the debtor or go through proceedings in the Netherlands. Without that, RIPE will not execute a garnishment.


Best regards,


Lars Grønlund
GITC ApS · www.gitc.dk