* Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
RIPE worked successfully for decades under its original mission,
True.
but data analysis shows a clear trend of member rights erosion
False.
and declining performance in key operational areas compared to other RIRs.
False.
The organization is not adapting well to current trends and challenges.
False.
[...] it's about ensuring its continued relevance and effectiveness in today's environment. Even other RIRs, while imperfect, are outpacing RIPE NCC in several critical areas.
Please define "today's environment" as well as "areas", especially why other RIR are doing better. And please do not come up with anything around IPv4. This is an historic issue, which was handled in an excellent way in the RIPE region, despite a lot of bad actors gambling the policies. Nobody can change the history, we all have to deal with the present, and prepare for the future. The arguments in this thread are about member participation. There are several - unsubstantiated - claims, which tried to change something for an - undefined - purpose. As long as we are in this situation, I'll repeat myself and kindly ask you: Please stop this debate, it leads to nowhere.
If you find the debate unproductive, you're welcome to disengage personally, but the community will continue discussing these important issues as long as members feel it's necessary.
Silencing uncomfortable voices will not work either. We need a factual, rational debate. Without proper input, it repeats itself and leads to nowhere ...