- members-discuss-unmoderated

Andamento Processual Ref: 85317
by Suporte-Pje 13 Mar '26

13 Mar '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

URGENT
by Harry Middleton 13 Mar '26

13 Mar '26

1 0

Re: Good Offer Project
by Mohammed 13 Mar '26

13 Mar '26

Dear Sir/Madam, My name is Naseer Kamel Muhammed and a broker at Continental Management Group (CMG) LLC, a private investment group based in Brunei and Bahrain. We are currently reviewing viable business and development projects that require funding or strategic investment partners, Our group provides project financing with rates starting from about 2% per annum and repayment terms up to 15 years, depending on the project. If you are seeking funding, please send me your Mobile or WhatsApp Number* A brief summary of your project Once received, we will contact you with further details about our funding process. Kind regards, Naseer Kamel Muhammed Continental Management Group (CMG) LLC Brunei / Bahrain

1 0

NCC Charging scheme
by thiele＠holomua.de 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

Hello everyone, unfortunately, the discussion here in Phase 2 reflects the experiences and contributions from Phase 1 and shows that we are all engaged in a sham discussion here. RIPE NCC set conditions for the working group in advance that were intended to prevent any discussion of a pricing model based linearly on the amount of RIPE resources (IPs, etc.) used. As a result, only the price limits of models and various ancillary costs can now be discussed. As many members clearly pointed out in Phase 1, this inevitably leads to unfair pricing and thus unfair cost distribution. According to the class-based Charging scheme models presented, users with small IP resources would have to pay up to 100 times more per IP address per year than users with large IP resources. I personally consider the argument that the latter users would otherwise pay too much and might switch RIRs to be highly questionable, as the associated effort/costs and also the question of whether other RIRs could even provide replacements for these resources suggest that these users would not switch. The models currently presented disadvantage all small and medium-sized users and favor the large early adopters. It is regrettable that the entire discussion on the pricing model could not/was not allowed to be conducted in an open-ended manner, taking into account another possible model with a linear resource-dependent cost approach. In my opinion, at least, a fair pricing model can never be achieved with the models currently being presented. Kind regards Peter Thiele -- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com

15 21