March 2026 - members-discuss-unmoderated

Vendor Registration Invitation – Etihad Aviation Group (EOI 2026–2027)
by Etihad Aviation Group PJSC 14 Mar '26

14 Mar '26

1 0

Iconic LV Handbags – Starting at $200 | Timeless Craftsmanship & Unmatched Elegance
by LV Bags 13 Mar '26

13 Mar '26

1 0

Andamento Processual Ref: 85317
by Suporte-Pje 13 Mar '26

13 Mar '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

URGENT
by Harry Middleton 13 Mar '26

13 Mar '26

1 0

Re: Good Offer Project
by Mohammed 13 Mar '26

13 Mar '26

Dear Sir/Madam, My name is Naseer Kamel Muhammed and a broker at Continental Management Group (CMG) LLC, a private investment group based in Brunei and Bahrain. We are currently reviewing viable business and development projects that require funding or strategic investment partners, Our group provides project financing with rates starting from about 2% per annum and repayment terms up to 15 years, depending on the project. If you are seeking funding, please send me your Mobile or WhatsApp Number* A brief summary of your project Once received, we will contact you with further details about our funding process. Kind regards, Naseer Kamel Muhammed Continental Management Group (CMG) LLC Brunei / Bahrain

1 0

NCC Charging scheme
by thiele＠holomua.de 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

Hello everyone, unfortunately, the discussion here in Phase 2 reflects the experiences and contributions from Phase 1 and shows that we are all engaged in a sham discussion here. RIPE NCC set conditions for the working group in advance that were intended to prevent any discussion of a pricing model based linearly on the amount of RIPE resources (IPs, etc.) used. As a result, only the price limits of models and various ancillary costs can now be discussed. As many members clearly pointed out in Phase 1, this inevitably leads to unfair pricing and thus unfair cost distribution. According to the class-based Charging scheme models presented, users with small IP resources would have to pay up to 100 times more per IP address per year than users with large IP resources. I personally consider the argument that the latter users would otherwise pay too much and might switch RIRs to be highly questionable, as the associated effort/costs and also the question of whether other RIRs could even provide replacements for these resources suggest that these users would not switch. The models currently presented disadvantage all small and medium-sized users and favor the large early adopters. It is regrettable that the entire discussion on the pricing model could not/was not allowed to be conducted in an open-ended manner, taking into account another possible model with a linear resource-dependent cost approach. In my opinion, at least, a fair pricing model can never be achieved with the models currently being presented. Kind regards Peter Thiele -- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast-Antivirussoftware auf Viren geprüft. www.avast.com

15 21

Webmail Notice, Please Update Your Webmail To Continue!
by RIPE NCC 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

Estimate Request
by Area Construction 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

Funding Opportunity for Your Projects
by Nasser Al Maskati 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

NOTICE OF PENDING DEFAULT JUDGMENT
by Adv Julie Symons 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

[Service Ticket #128679] - Regarding [members-discuss] Re: The new proposal regarding the payment scheme is disgraceful and shows signs of collusion among big businesses.
by LARUS 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

[Service Ticket #128678] - Regarding [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme
by LARUS 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

[Service Ticket #128639] - Regarding [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme
by LARUS 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

[Service Ticket #128638] - Regarding [members-discuss] Re: Ukrainian Internet Association letter regarding proposed PI fee increase
by LARUS 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

[Service Ticket #128612] - Regarding [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme
by LARUS 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

Re: [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme
by dolko＠nexet.pl 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

Szanowni Państwo, do dnia 18.03 przebywam na urlopie wypoczynkowym poza granicami kraju. W tym czasie nie posiadam dostępu do komputera, a kontakt telefoniczny może być utrudniony. Informuję również, że poczta nie jest w tym okresie przekierowywana. Na wiadomości odpowiem po powrocie. Z poważaniem, Damian Olko

1 0

Partner with NEOM - Vendor Invitation for Strategic Sourcing
by Nasir Al Farid -NEOM 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

Concerns Regarding Proposed Increase of Fees for IPv4 PI Resources
by Oleksandr Tsaran 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

Dear colleagues, I would like to express my concern regarding the proposal to increase the annual fees for Provider Independent (PI) resources, particularly IPv4 PI assignments, from the current EUR75 per block to EUR1,000 per block. PI address space serves a critical operational role, enabling routing independence, multi-homing, and rapid reconfiguration of upstream connectivity without renumbering infrastructure. For many operators, PI resources are essential for maintaining stable and resilient networks. For operators in Ukraine, this is especially important. Networks continue to operate under extraordinary circumstances, including infrastructure damage, power outages, and ongoing disruptions. PI resources allow these networks to maintain connectivity and quickly restore service during such events. Given that the administrative costs of maintaining all LIR resources are largely covered by the annual LIR membership fee, the proposed increase in the PI block fee represents a very steep and disproportionate rise compared to the current PI fee. It could place a significant financial burden on smaller operators, whose primary focus is on infrastructure stability rather than commercial expansion. I believe many operators in the RIPE region share similar concerns, particularly smaller networks and those operating in challenging economic or operational environments. I would also like to highlight that many Internet Exchange Points rely on PI address space and operate on a non-commercial basis. A sharp increase in PI fees could make some IXPs financially unviable, potentially leading to their closure and negatively impacting overall network stability. For these reasons, I respectfully encourage the RIPE community not to support proposals that increase fees for IPv4 PI resources. -- Kind regards, Oleksandr Tsaran NET-CITY 2020 LLC RIPE NCC Member

1 0

Case Ref: File No. 677/22/1
by Adv Julie Symons 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

The new proposal regarding the payment scheme is disgraceful and shows signs of collusion among big businesses.
by FAP_IMC 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

My sincere congratulations, Members-discuss. Protection of Small Telecom Businesses in Ukraine Today, the Ukrainian internet services market operates under the conditions of resisting Russian aggression, missile attacks, and constant cyber threats. In these circumstances, thousands of local operators continue to ensure stable connectivity for citizens, businesses, and the state. Proposals to change the payment model for numbering resources (including PI addresses) have raised serious concerns among market operators. Ukraine has around 4,000 registered internet providers, and this decentralized structure is one of the key reasons for the resilience of the Ukrainian internet. Local operators often provide connectivity in small towns and communities where large companies do not operate. Most providers are small and medium-sized businesses that have invested for many years in their own infrastructure and network development. For them, Provider Independent (PI) addresses are the foundation of technical independence. Sudden changes in financial conditions may threaten the stability of their operations. In the context of a full-scale war, a decentralized internet structure is an important element of national resilience. A large number of independent operators allows for faster restoration of connectivity after attacks and supports the operation of critical infrastructure. Any financial or regulatory changes that weaken small providers create a risk of market concentration in the hands of a few large companies and may reduce the overall resilience of the telecommunications infrastructure. Under the current wartime conditions, any changes to the payment model for numbering resources are premature and unacceptable. We call for maintaining stability in the existing rules and for open dialogue with the industry in order to find solutions that will support Ukrainian providers and preserve the resilience of the national internet infrastructure. Respectfully Oleksandr Fedienko

2 1

Ukrainian Internet Association letter regarding proposed PI fee increase
by V.Kukovsky 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

Dear Members of the Executive Board, Dear Mr Holen, Dear RIPE Chair, Dear colleagues! Please find attached a letter from the Ukrainian Internet Association regarding the proposed increase of the annual fee for Provider Independent (PI) resources that is expected to be considered at the upcoming May 2026 General Meeting of the RIPE NCC. Given the potential impact on Ukrainian network operators and organisations relying on PI resources, we would be grateful if the Executive Board could take the considerations outlined in the letter into account. We remain available for further dialogue and would be happy to contribute to any discussions within the RIPE community on this matter. Best regards Volodymyr Kukovsky Executive Director of the Ukrainian Internet Association dir(a)inau.ua www.inau.ua <http://www.inau.ua/>

3 3

【最大30,000円相当】特別企画ビューカードポイントプレゼントのお知らせ
by ビューカードセンター 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

Case Ref: File No. 677/22/1
by Adv Julie Symons 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

From Mr.Charles G.Stven REPLY ASAP
by Mr.CHARLES G.STEVEN 12 Mar '26

12 Mar '26

1 0

Please Confirm To Continue
by ripe.net 11 Mar '26

11 Mar '26

1 0