March 2026 - members-discuss-unmoderated

Undeliverable: Outgoing mail failed
by Mail Delivery System 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

1 0

Curriculo Sergio Mendes Valente
by Sergio Mendes Valente 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

week 12 in 2026, urgent products shipping from China to the The Netherlands by air
by Megan Ye - CIL 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

Dear Sir / Ma��am, Good day, this is Megan from China Innovation Logistics, freight forwarder in China. As knowing that your esteemed company have regular air shipments from China to The Netherlands, hope our strength can help you more for business increasement: 1. Direct service from Shenzhen / Guangzhou / Shanghai / Xiamen to Amsterdam 2. One-stop shipping from pick up to deliver 3. 7 days a week online monitoring 4.10 �C 15 years experienced operation team Here is the updated air freight rate for week 12 in 2026: Airport of ArrivalAirport of DepartureIncotermsCarrier��FrequencyRoutingT/T +100kgs+300kgs+500kgs+1000kgs AmsterdamShenzhenFOB Air China4.934.934.784.78dailyvia Beijing4-6days China Southern Airlines4.644.644.494.49dailyvia Beijing2-4 days Polar Airlines4.214.214.064.06dailyvia Brussles2-4 day GuangzhouFOB China Southern Airlines6.416.286.105.96dailydirect1 day Remarks: 1. all the above rates unit is USD/kg 2. all the above rates are all in one inclusive of Fuel Surcharge and War risks, not including any local charges It��s time to begin cooperation, we are always here. B.rgds! Megan Ye Overseas Manager, 12 years working experience as freight forwarder China Innovation Logistics Company Limited Add: RM 707, City Shanhai Pingji Center, No.51, Pingxin North RD, Longgang District, Shenzhen, China Tel:86-755-86062680 Fax:86-755-86065280 Cell phone & Whatsapp & Wechat: 0086-18813688395 E-mail: meganye(a)icloud.com Web: https://www.chincil.com https://www.chincil.com/product/product-4

1 0

Three (3) Incoming mails not delivered
by Mail Delivery System 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

1 0

[Service Ticket #138089] - Regarding [members-discuss] IPv6 is doing great in many places (Was: NCC Charging scheme - IPv6 deployment)
by LARUS 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

1 0

FW: [ripe-list] Discussion about Charging Scheme to RIPE NCC Members List
by Tiberiu Gîndu 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

Dear members, Please see attached a positioning document issued by us (ANISP / RoNIX) related to the charging scheme and other conversations that were exchanged on the RIPE community list (example attached). Best regards, Tiberiu Gîndu ANISP / RoNIX -----Original Message----- From: Mirjam Kuehne <mir(a)zu-hause.nl> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2026 2:27 PM To: RIPE List <ripe-list(a)ripe.net> Subject: [ripe-list] Discussion about Charging Scheme to RIPE NCC Members List Dear colleagues, Please note that conversations related to the RIPE NCC budget and charging scheme should take place on the RIPE NCC members list and not on the RIPE community list: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/ripe-ncc-mailing-lists/members-discuss/ Kind regards, Mirjam Kühne (RIPE Chair and List Moderator) ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/ripe-list.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

2 1

[members-discuss] NCC Charging scheme
by Akayo 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

In my opinion it would not be wise to aggressively audit members. We have 2026 and not 2009. It would cost much money and would lead to cost-intensive lawsuits: Millions of USD for a questionable cause. We should keep things simple: If a LIR with 128-times more IPv4 space only pays 2.7-times (= Model A) or 2.3 times (= Model B) so much we already have found the problem. --Kayo ---------------------------------------------------------------- From: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu(a)basen.net> Sent: Wednesday, 11. Mar 2026 – 17:27 CET +0100 To: Lutz Donnerhacke <L.Donnerhacke(a)iks-service.de> 'members-discuss(a)ripe.net' <members-discuss(a)ripe.net> Michal Krajčírovič <michal(a)krajcirovic.cz> CC: Subject: [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme You can't turn back time. Realistically, I mean. All this silly talk, no offense, of looting and industrial scale falsifying, etc - please. You don't need to be on a waiting list. I get 10+ emails weekly from various brokers offering, unsolicited, blocks of addresses. I can forward some of them to you if you want. The same offer is available to anyone else, too. Kaj ---------------------------------------------------------------- From: Michal Krajčírovič via members-discuss <members-discuss(a)ripe.net> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2026 17:23 To: Lutz Donnerhacke <L.Donnerhacke(a)iks-service.de>; 'members-discuss(a)ripe.net' <members-discuss(a)ripe.net> Subject: [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme Hello, I apologize to everyone; what we are discussing here seems absurd to me. Undoubtedly it is the fault of us, the small LIRs, that we do not participate in the voting where the question of how much we should pay is decided. However, the main issue is not being addressed — that IP addresses were historically allocated inefficiently, often based on fabricated addressing plans, and those who obtained them in this way now pay the same as small LIRs, who must purchase IP addresses at high prices. And what does RIPE propose? That they should also pay for a place on the waiting list. I have a different proposal: immediately stop all inter-RIR transfers initiate a complete audit of IP usage in accordance with addressing plans after the audit, return all IPs used in violation of addressing plans (which includes at least all those being sold at various auctions) to the free pool Where are the days when Arne Kiessling was almost shutting down LIRs? When every minor issue and every suspicion of non-compliance was examined? I personally experienced such an audit at one of my former employers. Today nobody cares, and some “CEO of I-don’t-know-what” writes here that he trusts the members. Sure. We have allowed our own registry to be looted. And now small LIRs are supposed to pay the same as large ones. I call on all small LIRs: let us take RIPE back into our own hands, push for votes not only on payment issues but also on a complete audit, and make it the first registry that will have IP addresses again — because it will reclaim them from those who falsified addressing plans in the past on an industrial scale and are now making millions from it. Michal ------ Původní zpráva ------ Od "Lutz Donnerhacke" <L.Donnerhacke(a)iks-service.de> Komu "'members-discuss(a)ripe.net'" <members-discuss(a)ripe.net> Datum 11.03.2026 14:10:47 Předmět [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme +1 for Sebastian Wiesinger and Gert Döring from my side. We are a small ISP and will be hurt by a price increase for PI and AS resources, because we are doing business with them. 75€ are an irrelevant level of pricing. Even 1000€ per year is not that much compared to the other costs we have (personal, energy, licences, taxes, hardware, …). OTOH those independent resources are a burden to all of us, because they require resources at each of our routers: They increase the routing table and we have no option to filter them out (like we could do on traffic engineering at PA space). So I’ve to compare the increasing hardware costs against a „prohibitive” fee. Not an easy decision. Lutz Donnerhacke Von: Sebastian Wiesinger <sebastian.wiesinger(a)noris.de> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. März 2026 11:12 An: members-discuss(a)ripe.net Betreff: [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme > On 11. Mar 2026, at 00:36, sdy(a)a-n-t.ru wrote: > > I completely disagree with you. > > I've personally proposed several linear models. I've proposed various risk > scenarios for the NCC and burden on participants. All proposals are being > ignored. Linear models are simply being removed from discussions by the > administration. Why? The MAJORITY of those participating in this > discussion here have spoken about linear models! This gives me reason to > suspect a certain vested interest on the part of the group and those who > set its goals. The majority of those participating in this discussion is not the majority of those reading or voting. There are not a lot of members that are outspoken about linear models. I’m having trouble to understand which group you mean. The RIPE NCC? The charging scheme taskforce? The members? Could you define what you have identified as the group having a vested interest in keeping linear models out of the charging scheme? > You claim IPv4 is closed. Then explain to us why the market price of one > IP address is already reaching $50? Why don't we see free resources, only > rising prices? The prices for IPv4 are falling for a while now. Still there will be no free resources until IPv6 adoption reaches 100%. (Taken from https://auctions.ipv4.global/prior-sales) > The schemes proposed by the working group not only create inequality among > NCC participants; they cement a system in which the majority will pay for > the very profitable business of a small number of NCC participants. This > group of participants has historically acquired vast amounts of address > space, in part by establishing an inadequate distribution model. Although > warnings about the risks of such a "helicopter distribution" of resources > have been voiced repeatedly, it seems as if the group is strictly > advocating for their interests. This is unacceptable! No-one is paying for the profitable business of anyone. Your membership fees are not handed out to other RIPE members. You’re paying for your RIPE NCC Services. This myth of an “inadequate distribution model” comes up again and again, can you define what you mean by that? The policy before the runout was based on the demonstrated need for addresses. Everyone that could proof a need for addresses got them. That doesn’t seem inadequate to me. There are no more IPv4 addresses to distribute so I’m not sure what you mean by “helicopter distribution”. There is no cake left to hand out. > The refusal to discuss linear models has led to the failure of votes on > new models time after time. This, as I understand it, also benefits this > group of NCC members. We voted almost 15 years ago for a flat model. This model was again and again chosen. The RIPE NCC is a membership organization, not a commercial undertaking. A strict “price per IP” model would move it towards a commercial offering which has a whole lot of implications. This was discussed again and again. I would assume that if a majority of members thinks that a more resource based approach to the fees would be good they would vote for the charging scheme model that moves towards that goal? That wasn’t the case in the past. The last time there was a category based model to vote on was for the Charging Scheme 2024 and that option didn’t win. > I believe the working group should be disbanded. Its work is pointless; > we've already voted against such payment options twice. We voted to keep the current model. If that is what the members want that is fine. > Ultimately, it's not the administration that decides what the payment > model should be. It should be the decision of NCC members, and it should > be a fair choice with all options, including linear models. > > Otherwise, all these "elections" will once again degenerate into a farce! What elections are you talking about? If you’re unhappy, there is an Executive Board Election coming up. I don’t see you on the candidate list right now but there is still time. If you want change there is your chance to influence the future of the organization. In general I don’t like these more or less subtle hints that there is supposed to be some sort of secret group or cabal or whatever you want to name it. The truth is that there are a lot of people and most of them have different goals and motivations. Getting 100% what you want is basically impossible. It will always be a compromise. Best Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG 90471 Nürnberg • Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 E-Mail sebastian.wiesinger(a)noris.de Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel • AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

7 11

[Service Ticket #137735] - Regarding [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme - IPv6 deployment
by LARUS 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

1 0

Re: [members-discuss] Re: NCC Charging scheme - IPv6 deployment
by dolko＠nexet.pl 17 Mar '26

17 Mar '26

Szanowni Państwo, do dnia 18.03 przebywam na urlopie wypoczynkowym poza granicami kraju. W tym czasie nie posiadam dostępu do komputera, a kontakt telefoniczny może być utrudniony. Informuję również, że poczta nie jest w tym okresie przekierowywana. Na wiadomości odpowiem po powrocie. Z poważaniem, Damian Olko

1 0

Cambia tenda prima dell’estate: 65% di risparmio + 100€ di rottamazione
by Arquati Promo Primavera 16 Mar '26

16 Mar '26

logo L’estate sta arrivando! Risparmia ora sulle tende da sole Arquati! 65% DI RISPARMIO ARQUATI 15% di sconto + 50% di detrazioni fiscali* (https://news.loccasioneperte.com/re?l=D0Iass8phI3at01cwI0ITmmu298bg&s=ODAGB… https://news.loccasioneperte.com/re?l=D0Iass8phI3at01cwI1ITmmu298bg&s=ODAGB… ** Per te 100€ per ogni tua vecchia tenda rottamata! ------------------------------------------------------------ Ottieni la promo (https://news.loccasioneperte.com/re?l=D0Iass8phI3at01cwI2ITmmu298bg&s=ODAGB… ** Nuovi spazi per godersi la bella stagione con le tende da sole Arquati! ------------------------------------------------------------ Con le nostre tende da sole made in Italy rendi la tua abitazione più bella, più sicura e più piacevole da vivere durante la bella stagione. CON LA NOSTRA PROMO HAI: * 15% sconto + 50% di detrazioni fiscale* = 65% RISPARMIO * Rottamazione Arquati: 100€ per ogni vecchia tenda rottamata * Motore in OMAGGIO * Tasso zero * Prima rata maggio 2026 * Finanziamento fino a 30.000€ in 10 anni ** Perché aspettare quando l’estate sta per cominciare? ------------------------------------------------------------ Blocca la promo (https://news.loccasioneperte.com/re?l=D0Iass8phI3at01cwI3ITmmu298bg&s=ODAGB… 10 anni di Garanzia Trasporto e installazione gratuiti Sopralluogo e progettazione inclusi *La detrazione fiscale si applica come da massimale previsto nell’allegato I della normativa vigente. Offerta valida fino al 31 dicembre 2026 disclaimer

1 0