February 2026 - members-discuss-unmoderated

Business Loan/Project Funding
by Mr. Floyd W. Brown 07 Feb '26

07 Feb '26

1 0

Fw:Re: Acrylic Bottles for All Industries
by Evelyn 07 Feb '26

07 Feb '26

Hi I noticed your products could shine even brighter with our premium acrylic bottles. They offer crystal-clear visibility, durability, and fully customizable designs. Many top brands choose us for quality that boosts shelf appeal. Would you like free samples or a quick quote to explore options? Best regards Evelyn

1 0

Fw: Elegant Acrylic Bottles at Wholesale
by Evelyn 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

Hi I noticed your products could shine even brighter with our premium acrylic bottles. They offer crystal-clear visibility, durability, and fully customizable designs. Many top brands choose us for quality that boosts shelf appeal. Would you like free samples or a quick quote to explore options? Best regards Evelyn

1 0

Re: [ncc-announce] [News] Phase 2 of the Charging Scheme Model Consultation
by Clement Cavadore 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

Dear Simon, all... Excuse me, but... *whaaaat am I reading ?!?!* Are you trying to shock your membership with some crazy options, in order to better have an acceptance on your category-based models ? Where has the fairness spirit gone ? Here are my comments: On group 1: Regarding the new member signup fees: I honestly don't care wether it's 1000 or 1500€, but it should be the same, IMHO, be it an additionnal member or not. IPv4 waiting list signup fees: Errr... why ? If you pay a membership signup fee, it should be enough. IPv4 allocation fee: Same comment. Then if you really think about billing stuffs as a waiting list and allocation fee, then, just bill all those fees as a sign-up fee, just don't play with words... I am not opposed to merger and acquisition fee, as it's additionnal paperwork for NCC. Transfer fee: on the two ends ? what's the deal ? Maybe in incoming, as it's paperwork based on the buyer's needs. Legacy registry update fee: Why not, as they do not have any contractual relationship. I think that ARIN does not allow updates on out of contract relationships, do they ? PI/ASN fees should not change IMHO. On groupe 2: PI fee at 1k€: ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR MIND ?! So, having lets say two PI and an ASN (ex: non-commercial IXP, for example) would lead to ~2k€ fee? this is a nonsence.... Alternative registry fee update: 1.5k€ ? Well, legacy would just stay legacy, and the DB would remain outdated... Discount for educationnal or lower income: Well, fairness is totally gone. Please, reconsider your options. Nothing is acceptable there. You cannot continue that way. I have seen way better suggestions (for example ALexis Hanicotte's suggestion on 20th january), that your phase2 suggestions. Maybe you should reconsider your 40M budget aswell. You cannot just continue to raise your member's fee (while protecting big players). If you just think it might be at risk with higher members, maybe we should introduce a policy restraining inter-rir transfers for big inetnums (incoming or outgoing, lets still be fair). Kind regards, Clément Cavadore On Mon, 2026-02-02 at 12:24 +0100, Simon-Jan Haytink wrote: > > Dear RIPE NCC members, > > Thank you for your feedback on Phase 1 of the charging scheme model. > > During the six week consultation period, members shared feedback via > the members-discuss mailing list and we also heard from members > directly. Thank you to everyone who took part and helped inform the > next stage of this work. We are now analysing the feedback to > identify where the models can be refined. > > *Phase 2: Separate Charges* > > We are now launching Phase 2 of the consultation, which focuses on > separate charges. In this phase, we are asking for feedback on two > groups of additional charges: > > Group 1: Charges based on task force recommendations > Group 2: Possible other charges, discounts and incentives > > You can find charges and detailed explanations of each charge at: > https://www.ripe.net/s/charging-scheme-model-consultation-phase-2/ > > Important: Please note that this is the consultation phase, and we > are looking for your opinion on which charges make sense and would be > acceptable for members. No charges or figures are set in stone - we > need your input before we make a final draft charging scheme that we > can bring to the Executive Board for its consideration in March. In > parallel, we are carrying out impact analyses to determine what > changes would need to be made to our systems in order to accommodate > new types of charges, and whether they would be possible to implement > for 2027 or need to be phased in over multiple years. We plan to > publish the impact analysis when proposing the draft charging scheme > for members to vote on in April. > > Phase 2 will run until the week of 16 February 2026. Your input is > essential for shaping the Charging Scheme proposal which will be > presented to the membership for a vote at the May 2026 General > Meeting. > > Please share your comments, questions, and suggestions on the > Members Discuss mailing list. > > *Next Steps: Phase 3* > > Following Phase 2, we will use feedback from both phases to revise > the proposal before publishing a combined draft covering the annual > membership fee and separate charges. > > We are also developing an online calculator to accompany Phase 3, > using the final draft model figures and the additional charges > proposed during Phase 2. > > We expect to publish both a complete charging scheme draft, an > impact analysis and the calculator at the beginning of April 2026. > > Kind regards, > > Simon-Jan Haytink > Chief Financial Officer > RIPE NCC > > ----- > To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription > options, please visit: > https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/ncc-announce.ripe.net/ > As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account > with the email matching your subscription before you can change your > settings. > More details at: > https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/

10 13

[Service Ticket #114216] - Regarding [members-discuss] Re: Charging Scheme Model Consultation: Phase 2 - comments
by LARUS 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

1 0

[Service Ticket #114211] - Regarding [members-discuss] Charging Scheme Model Consultation: Phase 2 - comments
by LARUS 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

1 0

Regulatory Requirement Notice – Renewal of Expired W-8BEN
by Interactive Brokers 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

1 0

Guia para pagamento [DARF-IRPJ MENSAL] - Vencimento: 06/02/2026
by Departamento Contábil 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

Guia para pagamento [DARF-IRPJ MENSAL] - Vencimento: 06/02/2026
by Departamento Contábil 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

Guia para pagamento [DARF-IRPJ MENSAL] - Vencimento: 06/02/2026
by Departamento Contábil 06 Feb '26

06 Feb '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0