January 2026 - members-discuss-unmoderated

Assinar documento: DOCUMENTO.members-discuss@ripe.net.docx
by ClickSign 20 Jan '26

20 Jan '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

Assinar documento: DOCUMENTO.members-discuss@ripe.net.docx
by ClickSign 20 Jan '26

20 Jan '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

Assinar documento: DOCUMENTO.members-discuss@ripe.net.docx
by ClickSign 20 Jan '26

20 Jan '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

Assinar documento: DOCUMENTO.members-discuss@ripe.net.docx
by ClickSign 19 Jan '26

19 Jan '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

禮品首選 First Choice
by giftcn 19 Jan '26

19 Jan '26

如閣下未能閱讀此郵件，請按此。 If you can’t see the image below, please click here The First choice for your Gifts / 禮品首選獎盃、獎牌、水晶紀念禮品、金屬徽章、運動套裝. Champion、Medals、Crystal、Badges & Sportswear. 尊貴客戶本公司專業為客戶提供優質的企業禮品及紀念品訂造服務，我們會以最優惠的價錢，提供高質素的生產服務,專門供應各種宣傳禮品及公司贈品。我司著重品質控制及有著多年的經驗，配合設有的品質檢驗中心，為我們供應的貨品進行嚴格及有系統的品質檢驗程序，達到客戶的要求。歡迎客戶在網站上選購合適貴公司機構的禮品，我們可以提供公司標誌印刷服務，我們的客戶服務團隊，亦可以提供各種實用的建議，令生產及印刷的過程更順利，更符合經濟效益。 Dear Customer, Our company is a professional gift service company with champion cups, medals, trophies, crystal prizes, advertising watches and key holders. With factory operated in China, Quality control is our main concern in the production cycle, with the experienced manufacturing factory and our quality control procedure, we gets the reputation of best quality production in the industry.You are welcome to provide the design diagram for quotation, our production team will provide a practical and economic way to fulfill your requirement. 查詢更多資料及報價,請聯絡 : For more information, Please contact : 電郵 / Email : giftcn(a)yeah.net 李小姐 (Anna Lee) 電話| Whatsapp 6819 1571 劉先生 (Andy Lau) 電話| Whatsapp 6819 2528 / 61898347 科銘實業有限公司 Coralart Industrial Company Limited 香港網站 / HK Website : https://coralarthk.diytrade.com 國內網站/CN Website : http://www.coralartcn.net/mindex.html 地址：香港九龍觀塘開源道49號創貿廣場2305室 Address : Unit 2305, Apec Plaza, 49 Hoi Yuen Road, Kwun Tong, Kong Kong. 如要取消訂閱，請到此處。 If you don’t wish to receive our Newsletter, please click here.

1 0

DOCUMENTO GZSBHD_members-discuss@ripe.net.docx
by ClickSign 19 Jan '26

19 Jan '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

DOCUMENTO HEIULZQ_members-discuss@ripe.net.docx
by ClickSign 19 Jan '26

19 Jan '26

An HTML viewer is required to see this message

1 0

My thoughts about the proposed Charging Scheme Models A and B (2027–2031)
by Akayo 19 Jan '26

19 Jan '26

Dear colleagues, though I'm a few weeks too late I want to wish you a Happy New Year! As far as I understand there are currently two proposed models for the RIPE NCC charging scheme for the period 2027–2031. Model A is category based where Model B is formula based. Here are my thoughts: 1. I do not support Model B for the simple reason that I think a formula based model is too complicated and therefore intransparent. Members should be able to immediately see (on paper, not being required to use a calculator) how many fees they are required to pay. 2. I support keeping the flat fee model (only) in case the fees are not increased. If the flat fee is increased all few years due to higher costs, I do not support it any more because it will be a financial burden for smaller LIRs. For instance, I think it would be a imposition for smaller LIRs to pay €3,000 per year one day. The hosting business is not getting easier—it's getting harder. 3. If a category based scheme is used, I think many categories are better than less categories. The current Model A has 21 categories (counting the €500 category in case the LIR has no resources at all) which is good. However, I think Model A is extremely unfair: 4. First, from what I can see, the largest single allocation is IPv4 /10 and there is not a single IPv4 /8 or even /9 allocation. So it is doubtful that even the largest LIRs will fall into the uppermost categories. That means there are categories which from the beginning on will never be relevant. 5. Also there is a big gap between the smallest and the largest LIRs. That means that the vast majority of fees continue to be paid by the smallest, small and medium-sized LIRs whereas the large and largest LIRs still contribute only a small amount (in relative terms). For instance, I own about an IPv4 /19 equivalent (= 32 x /24s). With this new model, my fees are increased from €1,800 to €3,080 which is quite much. If I would have an IPv4 /13 equivalent I would not be a sole trader but own a large company. I would not have 32 x /24s but 2,048 x /24s which is 64 times as much—but with this new model I would only pay €6,488. And if I would have an IPv4 /10, which is equivalent to 16,384 (sixteen thousand) IPv4 /24s I would only pay €8,503 though I would have 512 times as much space. This is not fair. And there is no simple middle course. If the stated goal is to make the scheme more fair then the larger and largest LIRs unfortunately need to pay way more because they are the only group which is not fee sensitive. It makes (almost) no difference for them whereas it does make a huge difference for us. Thank you for your time. --Kayo

3 3

[Service Ticket #113838] - Regarding [members-discuss] Re: My thoughts about the proposed Charging Scheme Models A and B (20272031)
by LARUS 19 Jan '26

19 Jan '26

1 0

Elegant Acrylic Bottles at Wholesale
by Evelyn 18 Jan '26

18 Jan '26

Hi I noticed your products could shine even brighter with our premium acrylic bottles. They offer crystal-clear visibility, durability, and fully customizable designs. Many top brands choose us for quality that boosts shelf appeal. Would you like free samples or a quick quote to explore options? Best regards Evelyn

1 0