6 Apr
2022
6 Apr
'22
7:16 a.m.
Hi Brian, all, On Mon 4 Apr 2022, 12:00, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
(As chair, running the consensus process) No, there is no reason not to go with three co-chairs for the next term; indeed (as a chair, stepping down, who has had fun with meeting logistics, and is an SRE at $dayjob) three chairs would in some ways be preferable, as it gives n+1 chair redundancy in addition to a breadth of perspective on measurement topics.
Agreed, especially on your last point. And in that case (just to be explicit): +1 for both Massimo and Stephen. Thanks, luuk